2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The illusion of “win–win” solution: Why environmental regulation in china promotes firm performance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental regulation policies may cause enterprises to face problems such as additional loss of environmental protection equipment and mismatch between production resources and original equipment, namely "compliance cost," which leads to the decline in enterprise production efficiency (Hancevic, 2016). Fu et al (2020) also denied the sustainable effect of environmental regulation on enterprises. The main conflict between the above two views is whether the government can have complete information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental regulation policies may cause enterprises to face problems such as additional loss of environmental protection equipment and mismatch between production resources and original equipment, namely "compliance cost," which leads to the decline in enterprise production efficiency (Hancevic, 2016). Fu et al (2020) also denied the sustainable effect of environmental regulation on enterprises. The main conflict between the above two views is whether the government can have complete information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERs have a favorable impact on sustainable growth up to a certain amount, but beyond that point, environmental regulation is detrimental to sustainable growth. Later, it was further suggested that environmental regulation has a facilitating effect on firms' performance and sustainable growth [8]. In addition, ERs have a facilitating and then inhibiting effect on the green economy [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provided a contrary view, also known as the Porter Hypothesis (PH), that more severe but well-designed ERGs can stimulate firms to innovate. Through cost management [ 5 , 6 ], the competitive advantages [ 7 , 8 ] and the pollution-related rent [ 9 ], firms can be fully or partially compensated for the cost incurred from the compliance with ERG, which helps improve performance. However, many empirical results show the opposite and imply that the PH does not hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%