Globalizing Social Rights 2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137291967_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ILO and the International Technocratic Class, 1944–1966

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the thirties, it began to develop technical cooperation activities, first with Latin America. These technical cooperation activities grew with international development programmes after 1945 (Guthrie, 2013). The aims and purposes of the ilo became larger after the International Labour Conference of 1944, taking in welfare, including several missions on the protection of health.…”
Section: Before the 1990s A Vision Based On Wage Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the thirties, it began to develop technical cooperation activities, first with Latin America. These technical cooperation activities grew with international development programmes after 1945 (Guthrie, 2013). The aims and purposes of the ilo became larger after the International Labour Conference of 1944, taking in welfare, including several missions on the protection of health.…”
Section: Before the 1990s A Vision Based On Wage Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characterizes labor issues as necessarily apolitical, technical, and streamlined. It also made the ILO more broadly an institution of technical assistance in the interwar years; although it was only by the end of World War II did the ILO form its ‘international technocratic class’ (Guthrie, 2013: 115–136). While Butler emphasized the legal recognition of trade unions as a necessary step toward Egypt’s admission to the ILO and its participation in the tripartite system of representation, he stressed the need to confine the functions of syndicates to representation of their workers’ constituency in the workplace and to ‘eschew politics’ (Butler, 1932f: 2).…”
Section: The Global Labor Movement Versus the Ilomentioning
confidence: 99%