2017
DOI: 10.1163/9789004344044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Imagination in Early Modern English Literature

Abstract: The final version of this review is published in Cahiers Elisabéthains:A Journal of English Renaissance Studies, 95:1 (April 2018), pp. 126-9. Published by SAGE Publishing. All rights reserved. Deanna Smid, The Imagination in Early Modern English Literature (Leiden, Brill, 2017), 210 pp, ISBN 978-90-0434403-7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is here that myth also applies. The characters and the words an author uses enable the reader to delve deeper into the complexities of the human mind (Smid, 2017). In doing so, the latter develops a better understanding of emotions driving other human beings.…”
Section: Northrop Frye's "The Educated Imagination"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is here that myth also applies. The characters and the words an author uses enable the reader to delve deeper into the complexities of the human mind (Smid, 2017). In doing so, the latter develops a better understanding of emotions driving other human beings.…”
Section: Northrop Frye's "The Educated Imagination"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, debates in Literature Studies can provide interesting examples of fantasy's connections to imagination from which we can learn. Fantasy is dealt with primarily as a generic category in the context of the novel where the intra-textual dimensions of fantasy and the fantastic are analyzed and compared (for a few select examples, see: Dath, 2019;Morse, 1987;Smid, 2017;Vax, 1963). Less common, however, are extra-textual studies about fantasy in the history of literature or an author's fantastical, imaginative motivations (Dath, 2019;Durst, 2001;Rabkin, 1976).…”
Section: Reality (Truth)/fantasymentioning
confidence: 99%