2010
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2010.487201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The imagined and the real: identifying the tensions for academic identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
161
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
161
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These pressures include contradictions, for example between spending time on teaching and supporting students rather than focusing on research qualifications and outputs. The lecturers are involved in identity reconstruction and experience considerable role ambiguity (Billot 2010). The multiple identities held by lecturers in the health professions appears to include one of 'clinical practitioner' but the place of clinical credibility and skills in the identity of an academic appears to be unresolved in many of the lecturers' workplaces.…”
Section: Juggling Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These pressures include contradictions, for example between spending time on teaching and supporting students rather than focusing on research qualifications and outputs. The lecturers are involved in identity reconstruction and experience considerable role ambiguity (Billot 2010). The multiple identities held by lecturers in the health professions appears to include one of 'clinical practitioner' but the place of clinical credibility and skills in the identity of an academic appears to be unresolved in many of the lecturers' workplaces.…”
Section: Juggling Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example in the UK, the research audit process has considerable power over the lives of academics (Harley 2002). Within this policy framework Billot (2010) proposes that institutions need to work at removing barriers that prevent academics from redefining their identity and also suggests that individual academics need to learn to tolerate role ambiguity.…”
Section: Changes In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancak Billiot (2010) günümüzde bu değerlerin yerini üniversitelerin ekonomik, idari ve ideolojik önceliklerini temel alan değerlerle yer değiştirmeye başladığını belirtmektedir. Bu çalışmanın bulguları genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde, katılımcıların büyük bir çoğunluğunun, üniversiteleri özgürlük ve özerkliğin sınırlandırıldığı, baskı ve hegemonyanın gözlemlendiği, bilimsel araştırma yapmaktan çok öğretim işlevinin ve maddi getirisi olan çalışmaların öncelikli olduğu, çalışanlar arasında yapay ilişkiler, samimiyetsizlik, çıkar çatışmaları ve bencilliğin olduğu, üniversitelerin içe-dönük bürokratik örgütler olarak algıladıkları görülmüştür.…”
Section: Tartişma Ve Sonuçunclassified
“…In the twenty-first century, however, we may perhaps be witnessing another shift. Indeed, loss of academic freedom is a frequent complaint among academics (see e g. Billot, 2010;Watson, 2010). In response to this, Kolsaker (2008, p. 516) says that 'a casual visitor to an English university may be surprised, therefore, to encounter an environment where academics seemingly come and go as they please, have a relatively free hand in course design, and disappear to do "real work" (research) for days on end', adding that, 'faced with this reality, we need to consider whether authority is really sapping away from academics'.…”
Section: Examining the Indicators Of Functionality In The 3gumentioning
confidence: 99%