The immediate and subsequent effects of response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy, motor stereotypy and heart rate

Frewing, Tyla M.; Tanner, Amy E.; Bonner, Andrew C.; Baxter, Sharon; Pastrana, Sarah J.

doi:10.1080/15021149.2015.1110407

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Results of this study contribute to the extant literature in two ways. First, results of this study extend the Schumacher and Rapp (2011), Pastrana et al (2013), and Frewing et al (2015) studies by showing that RIRD with 20-min components produced subsequent decreases in VS whereas RIRD with 5-min components did not. As previously noted, there is substantial empirical support for immediate decreases in VS using RIRD; however, to our knowledge, no prior study has shown that RIRD alone can lead to a subsequent decrease in VS. To date, subsequent decreases in either vocal or motor stereotypy have previously only been demonstrated when researchers treated stereotypy using noncontingent reinforcement with structurally matched stimulation (Brogan, Rapp, Sennott, Cook, & Swinkels, 2018; Rapp, 2007; Rapp, Cook, McHugh, & Mann, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 77%

“…Similarly, Pastrana et al (2013) found that RIRD decreased immediate engagement in targeted motor stereotypy for two children with ASD without altering subsequent engagement for either participant. Similarly, for an adolescent with ASD, Frewing et al (2015) found that RIRD decreased immediate engagement in stereotypy (motor and vocal combined) without altering his subsequent engagement in stereotypy. Importantly, all three studies (a) signaled the availability of RIRD in Component 2 of the RIRD sequence and (b) used 10-min RIRD (second) components in the RIRD sequence.…”

mentioning

confidence: 86%

“…The purpose of the present study was to replicate and extend the Schumacher and Rapp (2011), Pastrana et al (2013), and Frewing et al (2015) studies by evaluating the immediate and subsequent effects of RIRD for VS and appropriate vocalization in two children with ASD. In addition, we compared the immediate and subsequent effects of RIRD on VS when therapists implemented RIRD without a visual signal during 5-min and 20-min components within a multiple schedule.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

“…To date, only three studies involving a total of five participants have evaluated the immediate and subsequent effects for RIRD on either VS alone (Schumacher & Rapp, 2011) or motor and VS (Frewing, Tanner, Bonner, Baxter, & Pastrana, 2015; Pastrana et al, 2013). Schumacher and Rapp (2011) found that RIRD decreased immediate VS displayed by two children with ASD, but it did not alter (either increase or decrease) their subsequent engagement in VS.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Further Analysis of the Immediate and Subsequent Effect of RIRD on Vocal Stereotypy

Sivaraman¹,

Rapp

2019

Behav Modif

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although numerous studies have shown that response interruption and redirection (RIRD) can decrease vocal stereotypy displayed by children with autism spectrum disorder, relatively few have evaluated the subsequent effects of RIRD. We evaluated the immediate (when a change agent implemented RIRD) and subsequent (after a change agent discontinued RIRD) effects of RIRD on two participants’ vocal stereotypy using a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design with an embedded reversal design combined with a multiple schedule. As a part of the analysis, we conducted the fourth component 25 min after the third component. In addition, we compared the effects of RIRD with 5-min and 20-min components on both participants’ vocal stereotypy. Results show that (a) RIRD during either 5-min or 20-min components decreased each participant’s immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy, (b) only RIRD during 20-min components decreased each participant’s subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy relative to the no intervention component, and (c) the subsequent effects of RIRD did not extend into the fourth component for either participant.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 77%

mentioning

confidence: 86%

mentioning

confidence: 95%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Further Analysis of the Immediate and Subsequent Effect of RIRD on Vocal Stereotypy

Sivaraman¹,

Rapp

2019

Behav Modif

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Few published studies demonstrate generality of the effects of RIRD outside of a controlled environment or with relevant implementers (Cassella, Sidener, Sidener, & Progar, ; Frewing, Tanner, Bonner, Baxter, & Pastrana, ). Although Frewing et al () demonstrated generality of treatment effects to additional environments, there were no reported attempts to extend the effects of RIRD to additional implementers. By contrast, Cassella et al () attempted to demonstrate the generality of the reductive effect of RIRD on vocal stereotypy across multiple settings and therapists; vocal stereotypy remained at baseline levels, however.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of noncontingent music and response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy

Gibbs

Tullis

Thomas

et al. 2018

J of App Behav Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vocal stereotypy is a commonly occurring challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) that is frequently maintained by automatic reinforcement and often interferes with skill acquisition. Matched stimulation (MS), and response interruption and redirection (RIRD) are two interventions that have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing the occurrence of vocal stereotypy with participants with ASD. The current study sought to determine if the combination of MS (noncontingent music) and RIRD was more effective at reducing vocal stereotypy than RIRD alone and if the parents of children with ASD found the combination of MS and RIRD more socially valid than RIRD alone. The results suggested that the combined intervention resulted in greater suppression of vocal stereotypy and increased occurrences of on-task behavior in both participants. Additionally, RIRD required fewer implementations and had a shorter duration when combined with MS. Results suggest that the combination of MS and RIRD may be an effective intervention outside of highly controlled settings.

show abstract

A review of response interruption and redirection: 2007–2021

Ryan

Rosales

Rowe

2022

Behavioral Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this paper is to provide a review of the current state of the literature on response interruption and intervention (RIRD) beginning with the year the term was first coined. The paper aims to replicate and refine previous reviews on this topic by including: (1) only articles that used the term “RIRD”; (2) all behaviorally oriented journals with publications on the topic; (3) articles that evaluated RIRD across multiple topographies of automatically reinforced behavior; and (4) an evaluation of measures of treatment integrity, social validity, maintenance, and generality. Suggestions for future research and use of RIRD in clinical practice will be discussed.

show abstract

The immediate and subsequent effects of response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy, motor stereotypy and heart rate

Cited by 9 publications

References 22 publications

Further Analysis of the Immediate and Subsequent Effect of RIRD on Vocal Stereotypy

Further Analysis of the Immediate and Subsequent Effect of RIRD on Vocal Stereotypy

The effects of noncontingent music and response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy

A review of response interruption and redirection: 2007–2021

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About