The immediate effect of the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement on HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men in Nigeria: analysis of prospective data from the TRUST cohort

Abstract

Summary Background In January, 2014, the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act was signed into law in Nigeria, further criminalising same-sex sexual relationships. We aimed to assess the immediate effect of this prohibition act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement in HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men (MSM) in Nigeria. Methods The TRUST cohort study uses respondent-driven sampling to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of engagement of MSM in HIV prevention and treatment services at a clinical site located with a community-based organisation trusted by the MSM community. TRUST is a prospective implementation research cohort of MSM (≥16 years) in Abuja, Nigeria. We compared HIV clinical outcomes and stigma, including fear and avoidance of health care, across baseline and quarterly visits before and after implementation of the the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act. Outcomes assessed were measures of stigma and discrimination, loss to follow-up, antiretroviral therapy status, and viral load. We compared outcomes before and after the legislation with χ2 statistics, and estimated incident stigma-related events and loss to follow-up with Poisson regression. Findings Between March 19, 2013, and Aug 7, 2014, 707 MSM participated in baseline study procedures, contributing to 756 before legislation (prelaw) and 420 after legislation (postlaw) visits. Reported history of fear of seeking health care was significantly higher in postlaw visits than in prelaw visits (n=161 [38%] vs n=187 [25%]; p<0.0001), as was avoidance of health care (n=118 [28%] vs n=151 [20%]; p=0.001). In incidence analyses, of 192 MSM with follow-up data and no history of an event at baseline, reported fear of seeking health care was higher in the postlaw than the prelaw period (n=144; incidence rate ratio 2.57, 95% CI 1.29–5.10; p=0.007); loss to follow-up and incident healthcare avoidance were similar across periods. Of the 161 (89%) of 181 HIV-infected MSM with HIV viral loads available, those who had disclosed sexual behaviour with a health-care provider were more often virally suppressed at baseline than those with no previous disclosure (18 [29%] of 62 vs 13 [13%] of 99 men; p=0.013). Interpretation These analyses represent individual-level, quantitative, real-time prospective data for the health-related effects resulting from the enactment of legislation further criminalising same-sex practices. The negative effects of HIV treatment and care in MSM reinforce the unintended consequences of such legislation on global goals of HIV eradication. Strategies to reach MSM less likely to engage in HIV testing and care in highly stigmatised environments are needed to reduce time to HIV diagnosis and treatment. Funding National Institutes of Health.

HIV incidence among gay men and other men who have sex with men in 2020: where is the epidemic heading?

“…74 Further potentiating the biological drivers of HIV acquisition and transmission in all settings are the multiple forms of stigma affecting MSM that limit the provision and uptake of HIV prevention, treatment, and care services. [77][78][79] Exposure to stigma including culturally insensitive health workers can result in MSM avoiding HIV testing and other prevention services, limiting diagnosis and awareness of status. 78,[80][81][82] Even more acute, men who are aware of living with HIV may avoid HIV treatment altogether.…”

Building a Conceptual Framework to Study the Effect of HIV Stigma-Reduction Intervention Strategies on HIV Test Uptake: A Scoping Review

“…14 country, the increased fear of stigma and discrimination lead to avoidance of testing services by gay men and MSM (Schwartz et al, 2015).…”

“…The net effect is that felt stigma is typically more disruptive than enacted stigma. Schwartz et al, 2015 Original research (Quantitative)…”

Reductions in access to HIV prevention and care services are associated with arrest and convictions in a global survey of men who have sex with men

“…Where homosexuality is criminalised, studies have shown that MSM avoid accessing HIV prevention services due to fear of being persecuted, extorted or blackmailed 6 7 . W4 Dramatic reductions in access to HIV services have also been observed immediately after laws criminalising homosexuality were put into place 8 . W5 Additionally, enforcement of laws criminalising homosexuality can limit availability of services as they can force healthcare providers to suspend or deny services to avoid potential arrests and threats of violence 9…”