2002
DOI: 10.1137/s1064827501389849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Immersed Interface/Multigrid Methods for Interface Problems

Abstract: New multigrid methods are developed for the maximum principle preserving immersed interface method applied to second order linear elliptic and parabolic PDEs that involve interfaces and discontinuities. For elliptic interface problems, the multigrid solver developed in this paper works while some other multigrid solvers do not. For linear parabolic equations, we have developed the second order maximum principle preserving finite difference scheme in this paper. We use the Crank-Nicolson scheme to deal with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, we assume that φ : Ω → IR is a level-set function resulting from a segmentation process based on the image u 0 . Here, φ is usually considered as the asymptotic limit of the solution of some level-set propagation (1). We emphasize that this is not a restriction, because starting from a variety of other segmentation results (parametric surfaces, characteristic functions, phase-field etc.…”
Section: A Virtual Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the following, we assume that φ : Ω → IR is a level-set function resulting from a segmentation process based on the image u 0 . Here, φ is usually considered as the asymptotic limit of the solution of some level-set propagation (1). We emphasize that this is not a restriction, because starting from a variety of other segmentation results (parametric surfaces, characteristic functions, phase-field etc.…”
Section: A Virtual Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to the local virtual nodes by the local indices of their constraining parent nodes. A virtual node located at 1 2 (x j k +x j l ) is referred to as (j k , j l ). This implicitly gives us the set of constraining parent nodes D j from Section 2.3.…”
Section: Hashing Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This way of treating irregular points works for our problem, where the boundary condition is in the form of (23). For problems with jump conditions, this are somewhat different (see [4]). …”
Section: Substituting Into Eqn(38) Leads Tomentioning
confidence: 99%