2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32308-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The immune cell landscape and response of Marek’s disease resistant and susceptible chickens infected with Marek’s disease virus

Abstract: Genetically resistant or susceptible chickens to Marek’s disease (MD) have been widely used models to identify the molecular determinants of these phenotypes. However, these prior studies lacked the basic identification and understanding of immune cell types that could be translated toward improved MD control. To gain insights into specific immune cell types and their responses to Marek’s disease virus (MDV) infection, we used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) on splenic cells from MD resistant and suscept… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter study states limited resolution as a reason for not being able to identify different cell types, particularly T-cells, further. In comparison, the latter study reports that approximately 50% less genes were detected per cell [ 18 ] compared to the present results, which possibly explain their poor detection of genes with low expression levels e.g., CD4. Thus, the sequencing depth, numbers of analysed cells and bioinformatic approach of the current study generated considerably more information on leukocyte subtypes compared to these previous reports on chicken leukocytes and can probably be considered a “minimal requirement” for useful leukocyte subtype phenotyping by single-cell RNA-seq.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This latter study states limited resolution as a reason for not being able to identify different cell types, particularly T-cells, further. In comparison, the latter study reports that approximately 50% less genes were detected per cell [ 18 ] compared to the present results, which possibly explain their poor detection of genes with low expression levels e.g., CD4. Thus, the sequencing depth, numbers of analysed cells and bioinformatic approach of the current study generated considerably more information on leukocyte subtypes compared to these previous reports on chicken leukocytes and can probably be considered a “minimal requirement” for useful leukocyte subtype phenotyping by single-cell RNA-seq.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The identification of different T-cell populations in the current data set proved more challenging than that of B-cells and monocytes. Such problems have also been reported in other studies of single-cell RNA transcriptomics of T-cell subpopulations, for mouse and human T-cells [ 22 ], as well as for horse PBMC [ 15 ] and chicken spleen cells [ 18 ]. This can be due to limited resolution due to insufficient sequencing depth or to differences between mRNA expression levels and protein expression of markers by which T-cell populations are currently defined, e.g., CD4, CD8α and CD8β, or more probably a combination of both.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations