Topley &Amp; Wilson's Microbiology and Microbial Infections 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470688618.taw0220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Immune Response to Viral Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, HSV, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), and HIV are able to disrupt the crucial step of antigen presentation. Some viruses, especially those who belong in the Herpesviridae family, become latent, and can reactivate later in response to stress or immunosuppression [ Table 2 ; ( 73 )].…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Severe De Novo Viral Infementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, HSV, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), and HIV are able to disrupt the crucial step of antigen presentation. Some viruses, especially those who belong in the Herpesviridae family, become latent, and can reactivate later in response to stress or immunosuppression [ Table 2 ; ( 73 )].…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Severe De Novo Viral Infementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the innate immune response within the infection microenvironment, type I interferon (IFN), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) initiate anti‐viral responses by triggering the production of anti‐viral proteins (Ivashkiv & Donlin, 2014; Thompson, Kaminski, Kurt‐Jones, & Fitzgerald, 2011). Simultaneous activation of the adaptive immune response through T H and T C cells, and subsequent secretion of interleukin (IL)‐12 and IL‐4‐dependent signaling provides effective Th1/Th2 balance against invading pathogens (Nash & Dutia, 2010). However, the dysregulated immune response has been reported in several viral infections such as influenza, Ebola, hantavirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) which leads to severe symptoms such as anaphylactic shock, trauma, local tissue damage, and multi‐organ failure (Jain, Khaiboullina, & Baranwal, 2020; Martynova et al, 2021; Tang et al, 2020; Tisoncik et al, 2012; Younan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one assumed intratumoral LV injections every two days and the end of the experiment on the 6th day from the start of the study. Since adaptive antiviral response takes about one week to develop ( 29 ), at this timepoint, an immune response after the use of LVs may be observed, but the elimination of transduced cells should not occur yet. In the second scheme, the interval between the first and second administrations of LVs was extended to 6 days, in order to check whether repeated administration of the vectors after the development of the adaptive immune response induced by the first injection would also be effective in reducing the concentration of IL-10 in the TME, which was measured on the 10th day after the first LV application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%