2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability

Abstract: Results: At first few children used a Mass theory to explain their reasoning. However, after being confronted with counterevidence for the asymmetrical constructions, children changed their explanation and applied a Mass theory. More children in the play group with the highest degree of scaffolding, i.e., material + verbal scaffolds, acquired a Mass theory compared to the other groups. Fluid as well as crystallized intelligence contributed to children's acquisition of a Mass theory. Discussion: Counterevidence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(178 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the question of when basic scientific-thinking skills develop and how stable they are, is an important one. Our findings show that young children's scientific thinking and their inquiry skills are just emerging in kindergarten age, which suggests that educators and designers of learning environments need to consider children's skill level, offering them adequate degree of structure to support development (see e.g., Fridman et al 2020;Klahr et al 2011;Weber et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, the question of when basic scientific-thinking skills develop and how stable they are, is an important one. Our findings show that young children's scientific thinking and their inquiry skills are just emerging in kindergarten age, which suggests that educators and designers of learning environments need to consider children's skill level, offering them adequate degree of structure to support development (see e.g., Fridman et al 2020;Klahr et al 2011;Weber et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Yet, teachers' willingness to engage in a specific practice could bridge the gap between their beliefs and enacted practice. As research has shown that preschool teachers tend to prioritize play‐based activities (Leuchter & Saalbach, 2014; Sylva et al, 2007), we focus on the context of block play as an important aspect of science education (Weber et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on supporting knowledge through block play have focused on parent–child (Ferrara et al, 2011) or researcher–child interactions (Weber et al, 2020), while studies on teacher–child interactions during block play remain sparse. In block play, one of the central aspects is stability.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should therefore try to differentiate whether successful solutions are achieved through trial and error procedures or through the application of content knowledge. Moreover, upcoming research might investigate and compare kindergarten children's engineering behaviour in different science domains, e.g., the stability of block buildings (Weber et al, 2020), one-sided levers as simple machines (Leuchter and Naber, 2018), floating of objects (Hong and Diamond, 2012), and pursue two directions: (1) Studies should examine for different science domains whether kindergarten children can learn domain-specific content knowledge by being exposed to engineering design tasks (Lin et al, 2020;Penner et al, 1997). (2) Studies might compare children who received a training in the relevant domain-specific knowledge beforehand with children who did not receive a training (Benjamin et al, 2010;Marcus et al, 2021).…”
Section: Domain-specific Content Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%