The impact of a firm's make, pseudo‐make, or buy strategy on product performance

Abstract

Keywords:Modular/integral product architecture Make/pseudo-make/buy sourcing strategy U.S. bicycle industry a b s t r a c tThe bulk of the product architecture and make-buy choice literature deals with product architecture changes from integral to modular form. This development is often associated with a firm's tendency to change from a make to a buy strategy. However, a few studies investigate the change of product architecture in the reverse direction -from modular to integral form -and the subsequent change in the firm sourcing decision from a buy to a make strategy. These studies hold to the presumption that a firm following a make strategy will outperform firms following a buy strategy in dealing with integral product architectures. Based on the knowledge-based view, we argue for the viability of a sourcing strategy between the pure make and buy strategies -a pseudo-make strategy. We also argue that as product architecture changes from a modular to integral form, firms adopting this pseudo-make strategy are likely to show better product performance than firms following a pure make or buy strategy due to the relative knowledge advantages of the pseudo-make strategy in dealing with the integral product architecture. We examine the impact of the make/pseudo-make/buy strategies on product performance in the U.S. bicycle derailleur and freewheel market from 1980 to 1992 and provide theoretical and managerial implications of our results. Our findings highlight an important distinction between the pseudo-make and make-buy strategies that has not previously been fully appreciated in the extant literature, and as a result increases our understanding of why some firms do not switch strategies from a buy to a make strategy when product architecture changes from modular to integral form as previously expected.

Too much of a good thing: The impact of product variety on operations and sales performance

“…, we calculated the inverse Mills ratio for the purpose of correcting endogenous factors, and then used it as a predictor in Eq. (Chandrasekaran et al, forthcoming; Heckman, 1979; Park and Ro, 2011). Including the inverse Mills ratio corrects for potential unobserved factors that affect both the fill rate and sales performance.…”

Innovation shock, outsourcing strategy, and environmental performance: The roles of prior green innovation experience and knowledge inheritance

“…This study suggests that OCK may enable firms to enhance environmental performance (Brusoni, Prencipe, & Pavitt, ; Kapoor & Adner, ; Park & Ro, ). Without component‐specific knowledge acquired through dedicated R&D activities, the objective of monitoring suppliers' quality and reducing their chances of opportunism to achieve mandated environmental levels is difficult.…”

“…For survival in the market, incumbents need to develop and acquire knowledge and capabilities newly required in dealing with a new innovation (Anderson & Tushman, 1990;Tushman & Anderson, 1986). The outsourcing strategy helps firms searching for new knowledge beyond their internal boundaries and fosters the more efficient build-up of new capabilities (Abecassis-Moedas & Benghozi, 2012;Hill & Hoskisson, 1987;Park & Ro, 2011;Powell et al, 1996;Womack et al, 1990). This study develops arguments as to how incumbents can improve their environmental performance in pursuing an outsourcing strategy in dealing with an innovation shock.…”

The impact of competition on vertical integration: The role of technological niche width

“…Such understanding helps firms to constantly survey existing customers' demands and try to satisfy them creatively (Lubatkin, Simsek, Ling, & Veiga, ). Another group of scholars argues that nonintegration is a superior choice, which enables firms to access better quality components at a lower cost (Abecassis‐Moedas & Benghozi, ; Jaspers, Prencipe, & Ende, ; Jones & Hill, ; Park & Ro, ). Given the contradictory findings regarding the impact of vertical integration strategy on performance, we suggest that a firm's technological niche width can help explain this blurry relationship.…”