2015
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1059408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a living learning community on first-year engineering students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study supports previous research (Strayhorn, 2018;Gillen-O'Neel, 2019) that campus involvement or engagement influences students' sense of belonging. The link found between perceived peer support and living in an LLC supports previous research findings that students living in an LLC report a greater sense of belonging than non-LLC students (Spanierman et al, 2013;Johnson et al, 2020;Flynn et al, 2016).…”
Section: Summary Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study supports previous research (Strayhorn, 2018;Gillen-O'Neel, 2019) that campus involvement or engagement influences students' sense of belonging. The link found between perceived peer support and living in an LLC supports previous research findings that students living in an LLC report a greater sense of belonging than non-LLC students (Spanierman et al, 2013;Johnson et al, 2020;Flynn et al, 2016).…”
Section: Summary Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, students participating in such communities were more likely to persist in college (Tinto & Goodsell, 1993), were more engaged overall, and showed greater gains in intellectual and social development (Shapiro & Levine, 1999) when compared to their peers who were not involved in an LLC. There is also evidence that participation in LLCs leads students to feel more connected to the college or university (Pike, 1999;Inkelas et al, 2007;Wawrzynski & Jessup-Anger, 2010;Flynn, Everett, & Whittinghill, 2016).…”
Section: Living Learning Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International and Russian studies highlight different modern problems of higher education for engineers: the importance of creating new standards for training engineers by way of expanding humanities (Hadgraft, 2017;Lazutina, Tempel, & Tempel, 2017); the need to balance the theory, practice and experience in the educating process (Nickola & Kriek, 2017); the motivation to learn including the humanities (Kitovа, 2015;Pokrovskaya, Petrov, & Gridneva, 2018;Popova & Vdovina, 2016;Reyes, Enfedaque, & Gálvez, 2017); need for continuing of engineering education (Lawanto, Uziak, Villanueva & Scheaffer, 2017); formation of a correct understanding of technical terminology from the point of the scientific research culture (Nikiforova, 2015); develop of sociocultural skills, including legal competence, as our society requires (Chudinov, 2013) and no exit out the bounds of the technical sciences in engineer education (Cheshev, 2016;Egbert, Everett, Crockett, Farrell & Staehle, 2018;Flynn, Everett & Whittinghill, 2015;Gazaliyev, Yegorov, Ogoltsova, Yerakhtina, 2015). However, it remains unclear what legal competence of future engineer is.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In addition, engineering students that participated in the living learning community were positively impacted by the transition from high school to university by this program, connected positively with the university, had better peer relations, and an overall satisfaction with their experiences. 2 Satisfaction ignites an urge in students to return to the program where they were able to grow as learners and develop as individuals. Students who return to STEM learning communities for another year show exactly how positive the experience was for the students.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%