2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a pathologist’s personality on the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted, that our study in comparison to the other study reflects the real-life situation. The demonstration of a statistically significant correlation in this study is even more significant because it is known that interpretation of PD-L1 expression does have its peculiarities with varying interobserver agreement (Butter et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…It must be noted, that our study in comparison to the other study reflects the real-life situation. The demonstration of a statistically significant correlation in this study is even more significant because it is known that interpretation of PD-L1 expression does have its peculiarities with varying interobserver agreement (Butter et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…It also overcomes the common problem of interobserver variability in assessing the positive fraction of IHC stains. 15 , 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panels of IHC markers are used typically as an adjunctive to standard pathological diagnosis ( Painter et al, 2010 ), and help answer questions relevant to a specific clinical scenario. While a pathologist is capable of interpreting histological staining patterns using biological context, and naturally compensating for staining and tissue variability or artifacts to assess relative protein expression levels, they are not as well suited to making quantitative measurements of expression level or cellular percent positivity (e.g., Troncone and Gridelli, 2017 ; Tsutsumi, 2021 ; Butter et al, 2022 ). Conversely, IA is dependent on digitizing and measuring specific image features that relate to biology in question and are therefore very reproducible.…”
Section: 21 Clinical Decision Points—cutoff Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%