2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a peer-led participatory health and safety training program for Latino day laborers in construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Proper training to reduce gaps in safety knowledge and tailored to the construction sector can increase worker awareness, safety communication, and selfprotective work practices, while reducing lost workdays. 59,66,67 The training dimension also assessed the extent to which training was appropriate to the workers' English proficiency and education level. Our findings are in line with previous work showing Hispanic construction workers to be at risk of experiencing inadequate safety training.…”
Section: Safety Climate Scale and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper training to reduce gaps in safety knowledge and tailored to the construction sector can increase worker awareness, safety communication, and selfprotective work practices, while reducing lost workdays. 59,66,67 The training dimension also assessed the extent to which training was appropriate to the workers' English proficiency and education level. Our findings are in line with previous work showing Hispanic construction workers to be at risk of experiencing inadequate safety training.…”
Section: Safety Climate Scale and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of lay health promoter research supports the idea that people are most receptive to receiving information from individuals of their own cultural group [18, 21, 2325, 27, 58]. …”
Section: Designing a Training Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be an important area for future research. Safety training can have the advantage of being interactive (Goldenhar et al, 2001;Williams et al, 2010) and experimental (Goldenhar et al, 2001). More interactive methods could involve dividing workers into groups, to in current study analyze facts about how to control air contaminants and solve problems, which may include workers' own experiences (Williams et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%