1995
DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00385-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a policy of amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid

Abstract: With the policy of routine AI for moderate or thick meconium-stained AF, AI was not clinically feasible in 53% of the cases. We were unable to demonstrate any improvement in neonatal outcome in those who received AI for moderate or thick meconium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have shown improved acid-base balance in the fetus 55,61 and decreased likelihood of meconium below the cords 60,62 and MAS, 55,56,60 whereas others have not. 53,58 These differing results may, in part, be explained by the relatively small sample sizes of these studies and their differing study designs. In a retrospective study involving the largest sample studied to date, Usta et al 53 were unable to demonstrate any difference in neonatal outcomes in infants born to women who had received amnioinfusion for MSAF compared with women who had not received amnioinfusion.…”
Section: Prenatal Management Amnioinfusionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some have shown improved acid-base balance in the fetus 55,61 and decreased likelihood of meconium below the cords 60,62 and MAS, 55,56,60 whereas others have not. 53,58 These differing results may, in part, be explained by the relatively small sample sizes of these studies and their differing study designs. In a retrospective study involving the largest sample studied to date, Usta et al 53 were unable to demonstrate any difference in neonatal outcomes in infants born to women who had received amnioinfusion for MSAF compared with women who had not received amnioinfusion.…”
Section: Prenatal Management Amnioinfusionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…53,58 These differing results may, in part, be explained by the relatively small sample sizes of these studies and their differing study designs. In a retrospective study involving the largest sample studied to date, Usta et al 53 were unable to demonstrate any difference in neonatal outcomes in infants born to women who had received amnioinfusion for MSAF compared with women who had not received amnioinfusion. Moreover, they noted a higher incidence of fetal heart rate abnormalities and an increased likelihood of instrumental delivery and endometritis in women who received amnioinfusion.…”
Section: Prenatal Management Amnioinfusionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sample size calculations assumed a rate of aggregate maternal infection of 40% (based on incidences in the literature 10,12,13,15,17,18 ) and a 50% reduction in infection rate with antibiotic prophylaxis. For a significance level of a type-I error of 0.05 and a type-II error of 0.2, 93 subjects in each study arm were necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…139 EDITORIAL COMMENT: A multicenter, multinational trial to assess whether intubation and suctioning of apparently vigorous, meconiumstained neonates would reduce the incidence of meconium-aspiration syndrome (MAS) enrolled 2094 neonates. Positive pressure resuscitation should be delayed in these infants if possible until adequate laryngotracheal toilet has been performed.…”
Section: Meconium Aspiration Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%