The Impact of a Reentry and Aftercare Program on Recidivism

Abstract

In this article, we explore the impact of a reentry and aftercare service program on the likelihood of returning to prison by ex-offenders. Using administrative data within a difference-in-differences design, we find that this social program is associated with a reduction in recidivism rates. Benchmark estimates show that the program was associated with estimated reductions in the probability of recidivating of 6.0 to 8.7 percentage points. The estimate appears to be economically significant as it implies an estimated treated effect in the 15.8% to 19.2% range. We consider the heterogeneous effects of the program on reducing recidivism according to race, age group, and program type. The program helped to reduce recidivism among Whites but not Blacks; older participants were the main beneficiaries while the effectiveness of the program was observed among older participants. Back-of-the-envelope cost-savings analysis is incorporated to estimate the potential savings to the state arising from the reduction in recidivism rates likely attributable to the program. The findings are robust to sample selection bias, alternative specifications, and estimation techniques. Our results offer some implications for the role of faith-based social programs within the context of criminal justice reform to combat reentry of former inmates. They also provide a cautionary tale about the need to evaluate programs not just based on their overall effect.

Reentry support in Victoria, Australia: managing risk, or fostering agency?

“…The reentry sector aims to assist people who were incarcerated in their return to the community, and thereby reduce future offending and social harm. High recidivism rates suggest neither the prison experience nor reentry programs have had a universal effect of deterrence or rehabilitation (Cannonier et al, 2021;Cook & Haynes, 2021). In the last two decades, the knowledge and understanding around the challenges people who were incarcerated face has readily increased (Visher & La Vigne, 2020).…”