2003
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/58.1.p54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Acuity on Performance of Four Clinical Measures of Contrast Sensitivity in Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract: Investigations of contrast sensitivity losses in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yielded mixed findings, with some investigators reporting deficits and others not. Potential reasons for these discrepancies include differences between samples and assessments utilized and the failure of some investigators to account for acuity differences between groups. To investigate these issues, we administered four clinical contrast sensitivity assessments to the same group of AD patients and elderly control participants and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss of CS begins at 50 years of age, especially at high spatial frequencies (SF), where the loss might be as high as 30% relative to younger adults (e.g., Neargarder, Stone, Cronin-Golomb, & Oross, 2003;Owsley, Sekuler, & Boldt, 1981). Recent meta-analyses indicate that both VA and CS are linked to impaired cognition in aging, even in the absence of known disease (La Fleur & Salthouse, 2014;Monge & Madden, 2016).…”
Section: Perceptual Degradation (Hypothesis 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of CS begins at 50 years of age, especially at high spatial frequencies (SF), where the loss might be as high as 30% relative to younger adults (e.g., Neargarder, Stone, Cronin-Golomb, & Oross, 2003;Owsley, Sekuler, & Boldt, 1981). Recent meta-analyses indicate that both VA and CS are linked to impaired cognition in aging, even in the absence of known disease (La Fleur & Salthouse, 2014;Monge & Madden, 2016).…”
Section: Perceptual Degradation (Hypothesis 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the effectiveness of some of these methods in testing participants especially those with severe dementia should be taken into account. Fourth, participants may have been visually assessed without having had an eye examination, and thus, without knowing if the optimal Controversial but likely to be affected in AD, DLB and PDD [47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Stereoacuity Impaired in AD and VD 41,[54][55][56] Contrast sensitivity Impaired in AD and VD [59][60][61][62] Motion detection…”
Section: Visual Dysfunction In Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Such differences have been attributed to variations in the population under study, the method used to measure CS, or the failure to account for VA differences. 61 Additionally, not all studies checked for adequate ocular refraction, test distance or ocular health of participants. Spatial CS performance across a range of frequencies has been shown to be similar in AD, VD and mixed AD/VD cases.…”
Section: Contrast Sensitivity Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Differences in reported performance may be attributable to variation in patient population or assessment methods and especially failure to account for VA differences between groups. 50 Hence, it is likely that there are contrast sensitivity changes in AD, but it is not possible to be specific about the frequencies affected.…”
Section: Contrast Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%