2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of advancing age on postoperative outcomes in plastic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12,14,44 Collected data also showed no statistical difference in medical complications between elderly and very old patients in contrary to a recent database analysis, which showed that medical complications and mortality are more common in patients with age older than 80 years. 45 The review of the total flap loss showed no significant difference between the two age cohorts (6.3 and 5.1%, respectively) as both are comparable to the literature. 12,29,39…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…11,12,14,44 Collected data also showed no statistical difference in medical complications between elderly and very old patients in contrary to a recent database analysis, which showed that medical complications and mortality are more common in patients with age older than 80 years. 45 The review of the total flap loss showed no significant difference between the two age cohorts (6.3 and 5.1%, respectively) as both are comparable to the literature. 12,29,39…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The ASA PS classification is associated with significant inter‐observer variability and is influenced by staff characteristics as well as the complexity of diseases, leading to a lack of consistency . Age has not been shown to be independently associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery, unless accompanied with frailty . The markers of frailty, however, were not assessed in our study as they are not part of the ACS NSQIP® database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Microvascular reconstruction is the gold standard for many forms of head and neck reconstruction (Hanasono et al, ; Kakarala et al, ), but in older patients the impact of age on extirpative, reconstructive, aesthetic, and wound healing outcomes has remained a controversial area with competing opinions (Antony, McCarthy, Disa, & Mehrara, ; Fischer, Nelson, Serletti, & Wu, ; Shih, De Oliveira, Qin, & Kim, ). Head and neck ablative surgery with microvascular reconstruction is a challenging operation and postoperative recovery in an often already medically‐compromised patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%