2017
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2017.1373059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of age and exposure on EFL achievement in two learning contexts: formal instruction and formal instruction + content and language integrated learning (CLIL)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the distribution of language instruction deserves attention as the intensity of instruction makes positive changes on language attainment, language learning attitude and motivation (Collins & White, 2011;Spada & Lightbrown, 1989). Some studies show positive benefits of more exposure at earlier ages (Artieda, Roquet & Nicolás-Conesa, 2017;Munoz, 2012). However, if instructional hours are not used effectively, it is unlikely that successful results are obtained (Djigunovic, 2012;Collins & Munoz, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the distribution of language instruction deserves attention as the intensity of instruction makes positive changes on language attainment, language learning attitude and motivation (Collins & White, 2011;Spada & Lightbrown, 1989). Some studies show positive benefits of more exposure at earlier ages (Artieda, Roquet & Nicolás-Conesa, 2017;Munoz, 2012). However, if instructional hours are not used effectively, it is unlikely that successful results are obtained (Djigunovic, 2012;Collins & Munoz, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The picture that emerges is that English learners who begin CLIL instruction later in primary school reach equivalent proficiency levels and display faster rates of FL learning compared to learners who have been in the CLIL program since the beginning of primary education (see also Lorenzo, Casal, & Moore, 2010). In a recent study on the question of how much additional exposure to the FL through CLIL is necessary for learners to enjoy linguistic gains, Artieda, Roquet, and Nicolás–Conesa (2017) analyzed two different constellations of partial CLIL instruction in Spanish secondary school: two groups of students with similar hours of instruction but different ages in two contexts—formal instruction (FI) and CLIL—and students with the same age but different hours of instruction. Keeping starting age constant, they found that CLIL learners needed to be up to 2 years younger than their FI counterparts to outperform them with the same number of hours of instruction.…”
Section: Age and Content And Language Integrated Learning Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A school which offers two CLIL subjects triples the number of contact hours compared with a school merely offering a standard L1-medium programme with foreign language classes. This increased contact time with the L2 makes CLIL a potentially suitable strategy to promote plurilingual education (see, for example, Artieda et al 2017;Dalton-Puffer 2008).On the other hand, a minimal CLIL programme may not be sufficient to make a difference, at least in the short run (Pladevall-Ballester & Vallbona 2016).…”
Section: Increased Contact Time With the L2mentioning
confidence: 99%