2020
DOI: 10.1504/ijids.2020.105013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of agricultural technology adoption on income inequality: a propensity score matching analysis for rural Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implied that the adoption of CA requires more labor force. This finding in line with [31,38] and [39].…”
Section: Family Sizesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implied that the adoption of CA requires more labor force. This finding in line with [31,38] and [39].…”
Section: Family Sizesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…There is also literature that focuses on the impacts of single technologies on households' poverty and income [36,37]. However, these studies used OLS and logit-based PSMs [37,38,39] for impact evaluation models that are criticized for selection bias, endogeneity, and heterogeneity problems. To reduce the problems of selection bias and endogeneity, a multinomial endogenous switching model was implemented in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertilizer consumption is found to boost agricultural productivity since it is expected to enhance natural soil nutrients, as confirmed in the literature by Azhar (1991), Nastis et al . (2012) and Shita et al. (2020).…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fertilizer is believed to boost agricultural productivity by enhancing natural soil nutrients (Azhar, 1991; Nastis et al ., 2012; Shita et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Empirical Model Data and Econometric Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation