2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of ambient air pollution on lung function and respiratory symptoms in elite athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship may be due to oxidative stress caused by acute exposure to ozone, increases in nitric oxide (NO) and other reactive nitrogen species in the lungs, which are then modified to produce S-nitroso mercaptan (SNO), thereby changing protein function and acting on macrophages and ultimately leading to lung inflammation. However, SAD was not found to be significantly associated with other air pollutants, including PM 2.5 , PM 10 , SO 2 , CO, and NO 2 , which may be due to a lag effect [ 46 ]. Further research is needed to explore these correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship may be due to oxidative stress caused by acute exposure to ozone, increases in nitric oxide (NO) and other reactive nitrogen species in the lungs, which are then modified to produce S-nitroso mercaptan (SNO), thereby changing protein function and acting on macrophages and ultimately leading to lung inflammation. However, SAD was not found to be significantly associated with other air pollutants, including PM 2.5 , PM 10 , SO 2 , CO, and NO 2 , which may be due to a lag effect [ 46 ]. Further research is needed to explore these correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering time differences in the impact of environmental variables on outcomes, the severity and pathogen detection were respectively matched with admission and sampling time. Based on the cumulative effect of environmental factors on lung function, multiple-day lags (from lag 0–1 to lag 0–6) were matched to the environmental variables, while only temperature [ 17 , 18 ] was matched to a 3-day moving average (lag 0–2 days) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%