2016
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of an automatic syringe dispensing machine in inner‐city Sydney, Australia: No evidence of a ‘honey‐pot’ effect

Abstract: Automatic dispensing machine users were largely clients of the existing fixed-site service and lived locally. There was no apparent concurrent increase in crime or a honey-pot effect. It is important that services continue to be aware of community concerns and respond to them appropriately.[Day CA, White B, Haber PS. The impact of an automatic syringe dispensing machine in inner-city Sydney, Australia: No evidence of a 'honey-pot' effect. Drug Alcohol Rev 2016;35:637-643].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, constituencies reported barriers as current political climate, lack of community level preparation, and cultural context [23]. PHVM are not associated with increases in crime rates, nor has loitering or related activity been observed [24].…”
Section: Acceptability (Participant Perspectives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, constituencies reported barriers as current political climate, lack of community level preparation, and cultural context [23]. PHVM are not associated with increases in crime rates, nor has loitering or related activity been observed [24].…”
Section: Acceptability (Participant Perspectives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that some people who use ADMs differ from those who access face-to-face NSPs or pharmacies for injecting equipment, reporting that primary ADM users were younger, had shorter durations of injecting, injected less frequently, were less likely to report risky injecting practices or to have received opioid agonist treatment (OAT) [ 5 , 7 , 17 , 18 ]. However, two recent Australian studies suggested that when ADMs were located adjacent to face-to-face NSPs and near pharmacies, the ADM was primarily used by clients of face-to-face services who used the ADM outside business hours [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The community response to this announcement was reported in the local print and state-wide radio and television media (Channel 10 News, 2013;Day et al, 2014;Fordham, 2013aFordham, , 2013bFordham, , 2013cFordham, , 2013dWhite et al, 2014). Media attention was largely focused on perceptions of a "honey-pot" effect, a perceived increased in crime, reduced public amenity and a poor understanding of the aims of harm reduction imbued with a sense of NIMBYism ('not in my back yard'), remarkably similar to that described by Davidson and Howe (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%