2014
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2013.833075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of an Online Tutoring Program on Mathematics Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings from this study aligned with previous studies that demonstrated positive effects associated with the use of supplemental digital resources and students' mathematics performance among students at the elementary, intermediate, and junior high levels (e.g., Chappell, Arnold, Nunnery, & Grant, 2015;Clark & Whetstone, 2014;Kiriakidis & Geer, 2014;Martindale et al, 2005;Nunnery & Ross, 2007;Ysseldyke & Bolt, 2007). Among each campus level, Think Through Math © usage accounted for more than half of the variance in students' STAAR mathematics assessment scores than would be explained by chance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings from this study aligned with previous studies that demonstrated positive effects associated with the use of supplemental digital resources and students' mathematics performance among students at the elementary, intermediate, and junior high levels (e.g., Chappell, Arnold, Nunnery, & Grant, 2015;Clark & Whetstone, 2014;Kiriakidis & Geer, 2014;Martindale et al, 2005;Nunnery & Ross, 2007;Ysseldyke & Bolt, 2007). Among each campus level, Think Through Math © usage accounted for more than half of the variance in students' STAAR mathematics assessment scores than would be explained by chance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While these studies have presented research-based findings to substantiate the positive effects associated with the use of supplemental digital resources during math instruction, the literature has also pointed to possible disadvantages. For example, supplemental digital resources may be cost-prohibitive for schools, as well as time-prohibitive for teachers (Clark & Whetstone, 2014). Also, supplemental digital resources may have limited effects on student subpopulations, such as underperforming students and English language learners (Rutherford et al, 2014).…”
Section: Impact Of a Web-based Adaptive Supplemental Digital Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the time investment required to achieve these gains is not substantial. Clark and Whetstone (2014) found that students who spent "as little as 50 minutes per week" (p. 465) participating in online mathematics tutoring experienced an effect size of .68-equivalent to more than two thirds of a year's worth of improvement. Even more impressive are the results from a study of middle school students that found that more intensive tutoring at five hours per week for a 6-week period resulted in an average gain of an entire grade level in mathematics for participating students (eSchool News, 2009).…”
Section: Online Tutoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants highlighted things such as Internet issues, flaws in how the programs were designed, and cost. Several studies have identified these as barriers as well (Clark & Whetstone, 2014;De Witte & Rogge, 2014;Shih et al, 2012). The drawbacks noted by participates were much fewer than the positive features mentioned and thus led to the overall perception that adaptive learning programs are beneficial for students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%