The Impact of Ancient Genome Studies in Archaeology

Abstract

The study of ancient genomes has burgeoned at an incredible rate in the last decade. The result is a shift in archaeological narratives, bringing with it a fierce debate on the place of genetics in anthropological research. Archaeogenomics has challenged and scrutinized fundamental themes of anthropological research, including human origins, movement of ancient and modern populations, the role of social organization in shaping material culture, and the relationship between culture, language, and ancestry. Moreover, the discussion has inevitably invoked new debates on indigenous rights, ownership of ancient materials, inclusion in the scientific process, and even the meaning of what it is to be a human. We argue that the broad and seemingly daunting ethical, methodological, and theoretical challenges posed by archaeogenomics, in fact, represent the very cutting edge of social science research. Here, we provide a general review of the field by introducing the contemporary discussion points and summarizing methodological and ethical concerns, while highlighting the exciting possibilities of ancient genome studies in archaeology from an anthropological perspective. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Anthropology, Volume 49 is October 21, 2020. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Ethics of DNA research on human remains: five globally applicable guidelines

“…There have been instances of journalistic and governmental misrepresentation of study findings for political ends, and scientists have an obligation to work to correct misinterpretation when appropriate 64 . Reaching out to the public can include writing essays and books, and contributing to social media and documentaries [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100] .…”

Analyzing asymmetries and praxis in aDNA research: A bioanthropological critique

“…The recent explosion of ancient DNA (aDNA) studies has spurred a heated debate on the contribution that molecular-biology-oriented practices might make to solving long-standing questions in archaeology, biological anthropology, and other anthropological research areas (Bolnick et al 2007;Gokcumen and Frachetti 2020;Kemp et al 2007;Leonardi et al 2017;O'Rourke and Raff 2010;Reich 2018). Accepted hypotheses pertaining to patterns of ancestry and the relationship between culturally and biologically diverse human populations in the present and trajectories of migration of earlier Homo sapiens populations have been recently, and importantly, affected by genomicbioinformatic analyses drawn from key samples from the archaeological past in different regions of the world (Barquera et al 2020;Fu et al 2016;Haak et al 2015;Lipson et al 2020;Nakatsuka et al 2020;Olalde et al 2019;Patterson et al 2012;Racimo et al 2020;Yu et al 2020).…”

Landscape and Settlement over 4 millennia on the south side of Lake Issyk kul, Kyrgyzstan: Preliminary Results of Survey Research in 2019-2021

“…New forms of evidence for explaining the trade, communication, and migration networks of the intermontane regions of Central Asia and their importance to the Eurasian steppe have included detailed archaeobotanical research tracing the pathways of domesticated plants [2][3][4][5][6]. Ancient DNA studies have traced human population movements [7][8][9], while isotope analyses of ancient human and animal bone materials have documented mobility and dietary practices [10,11]. These laboratory studies on ancient plant, animal, and human remains augment a rich inventory of material culture from archaeological settlements.…”