2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of annealing temperature on improving microstructure and toughness of electron beam welded duplex stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a longer 60 min annealing time, the austenite volume fraction is increased further, up to 46.4%. Several studies have shown that annealing at 1000–1050 °C results in the highest austenite content in duplex stainless steels [7,15,35,36]. Annealing reactivates the transformation of the metastable ferrite into austenite, which was suppressed by fast cooling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a longer 60 min annealing time, the austenite volume fraction is increased further, up to 46.4%. Several studies have shown that annealing at 1000–1050 °C results in the highest austenite content in duplex stainless steels [7,15,35,36]. Annealing reactivates the transformation of the metastable ferrite into austenite, which was suppressed by fast cooling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annealing reactivates the transformation of the metastable ferrite into austenite, which was suppressed by fast cooling. With increasing the annealing temperature, more metastable ferrite transforms into austenite, but simultaneously thermodynamic equilibrium favors the transformation of austenite into ferrite [35]. A balance is reached in annealing at temperatures between 1000 °C and 1050 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [15] reported that during the deformation process, the characteristics of the phase interface between ferrite and austenite play a significant role and affect the impact toughness of the DSS. Generally, based on the Kurdjumov–Sachs (K–S) model, the orientation of the phase interfaces between ferrite and austenite are coherent or semicoherent, while the other phase interfaces are incoherent interfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patra et al (2016) [18] showed that stress accumulation at an incoherent interface was more easily released by sliding at the interphase boundary. Zhang et al [15] also reported that incoherent interfaces are more prone to slip than coherent interfaces. It can be inferred that a higher proportion of RPB facilitates the release of the sliding interface boundary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, during the BCC-FCC transformation, some variants were selected according to different ORs. The KS OR was mostly found by researchers in DSS weldments [38,[43][44][45]. Generally, the KS OR of the austenite/ferrite interphases follows a coherent or semi-coherent interphase.…”
Section: Interphase Boundary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%