1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199706)11:3<223::aid-acp444>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Anxiety on Memory for Details in Spider Phobics

Abstract: According to the attentional narrowing account of emotional memory, physiological arousal results in attention being directed towards central rather than peripheral characteristics of the situation. Consequently, memory for central details would be relatively good, whereas memory for peripheral information would be impaired. The present experiment sought to test this attentional narrowing hypothesis under highly stressful conditions. Spider phobics and low‐fear controls were confronted with a large live spider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation relates to literature suggesting that anxious activation inhibits memory for peripheral details (see Christianson, 1992;Wessel & Merckelbach, 1997. According to the attention narrowing hypothesis, individuals who experience a state of physiological arousal direct their attentional resources toward threat-relevant information at the expense of threat-irrelevant information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative explanation relates to literature suggesting that anxious activation inhibits memory for peripheral details (see Christianson, 1992;Wessel & Merckelbach, 1997. According to the attention narrowing hypothesis, individuals who experience a state of physiological arousal direct their attentional resources toward threat-relevant information at the expense of threat-irrelevant information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that anxious individuals accurately recall threat-relevant material that is actually present in their environment because they closely monitor it and direct a substantial amount of cognitive resources toward it (cf. Wessel & Merckelbach, 1997. However, because anxious individuals often catastrophize the implications of and exaggerate the distress associated with encounters with threat (Marks & Hemsley, 1999), it also is likely that they would be prone to recalling some aspects of threat that were never present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Negative emotional arousal enhances the recall of themes of events with reduced memory for details from before, during, and after the event in participating and witnessing agents (Adolphs, Tranel, & Denburg, 2000;Bornstein, Liebel, & Scarberry, 1998;Christianson, 1992;Christianson & Hü binette, 1993;Wessel & Merckelbach, 1997). Efforts to suppress the expression of negative emotion, as shown in film viewing experiments, impair further memory for non-visual material (Richards, 2004;Richards & Gross, 2000).…”
Section: Commentary Cognitive Consequences and Constraints On Reasonimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of emotional stimuli results in a central/peripheral tradeoff effect in memory (e.g., Wessel and Merckelbach, 1997; Kensinger et al, 2005, 2007). Prior work suggests that emotions change the nature of memory representations for the emotion-eliciting stimulus and surrounding neutral information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, participants were more accurate to identify repeated negative versus neutral central pictures, and less accurate to detect a change in the periphery if the peripheral objects were previously studied with a negative compared to a neutral picture (e.g., Wessel and Merckelbach, 1997; Brown, 2003; Kensinger et al, 2005). Interestingly, while emotion-impaired participants’ ability to detect a change in the peripheral objects, it did not modulate their ability to identify repeated peripheral objects (see: Kensinger et al, 2005, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%