The Impact of Armed Civil Conflict on Household Welfare and Policy

Abstract

This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for teaching or nonprofit purposes, but not for resale. Formal permission is required for all such uses, but normally will be granted immediately. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher and a fee may be payable. Patricia Justino SummaryThis paper offers a framework for analysing the effects of armed conflicts on households and the ways in which households in turn respond to and cope with the conflicts. It distinguishes between direct and indirect effects, and shows that the indirect effects are channelled through (i) markets, (ii) political institutions, and (iii) social networks. Drawing upon the recent empirical literature, the paper portrays the processes running along these various channels and offers policy suggestions to be adopted at both national and international levels.

Armed Conflicts and Food Insecurity: Evidence from Boko Haram's Attacks

“…This implies that households living in conflict zones adjust their consumption patterns to avoid acute situations of food insecurity. This finding is consistent with Justino (2011) and Ibáñez and Moya (2010), who show that households engage in consumption smoothing strategies to withstand shocks inflicted by conflicts.…”

“…First, in many conflict‐affected countries, households are already exposed to non‐conflict shocks, including natural disasters, political instabilities and income uncertainties (Townsend 1994; Maccini and Yang 2009). For such households, armed conflicts present an additional shock to which they often respond by smoothening their food consumption (Justino 2011). Second, there is evidence that households shift their crop, livestock, and asset portfolios to adopt low‐risk, low‐return coping strategies to survive conflicts (Rockmore 2012; Arias, Ibáñez, and Zambrano 2018).…”

Movers or Stayers? Understanding the Drivers of IDP Camp Decongestion During Post-Conflict Recovery in Uganda

“…Such a measure accounts for the fact that households located at different points in the same district experience different degrees of exposure to violent conflict. Accounting for recent exposure to war is important, given that war shapes individual expectations and preferences (Bozzoli et al, 2011;Voors et al, 2010), human capital (Justino and Verwimp 2006), household welfare 4 (Fiala, 2011;Justino, 2011), and the local economy ( Brück, 2004), all of which are vital for reintegration after conflict.…”

Armed Conflict and the Timing of Childbearing in Azerbaijan

“…First, in most societies, the family, its composition, and functioning are still fundamental to individuals’ perception of life quality and well‐being (Pichler 2006; Alesina and Giuliano 2010). This centrality is especially true for those living in conditions of protracted physical, political, and economic insecurity, where the family represents the basic unit of subsistence and a key element in people's coping strategies (Justino 2011). Addressing how situations of violence and insecurity influence the family domain and household childbearing decisions is important to ensure and promote individual and community resilience.…”