The impact of attrition on the representativeness of cohort studies of older people

Abstract

BackgroundThere are well-established risk factors, such as lower education, for attrition of study participants. Consequently, the representativeness of the cohort in a longitudinal study may deteriorate over time. Death is a common form of attrition in cohort studies of older people. The aim of this paper is to examine the effects of death and other forms of attrition on risk factor prevalence in the study cohort and the target population over time.MethodsDifferential associations between a risk factor and death and non-death attrition are considered under various hypothetical conditions. Empirical data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) for participants born in 1921-26 are used to identify associations which occur in practice, and national cross-sectional data from Australian Censuses and National Health Surveys are used to illustrate the evolution of bias over approximately ten years.ResultsThe hypothetical situations illustrate how death and other attrition can theoretically affect changes in bias over time. Between 1996 and 2008, 28.4% of ALSWH participants died, 16.5% withdrew and 10.4% were lost to follow up. There were differential associations with various risk factors, for example, non-English speaking country of birth was associated with non-death attrition but not death whereas being underweight (body mass index < 18.5) was associated with death but not other forms of attrition. Compared to national data, underrepresentation of women with non-English speaking country of birth increased from 3.9% to 7.2% and over-representation of current and ex-smoking increased from 2.6% to 5.8%.ConclusionsDeaths occur in both the target population and study cohort, while other forms of attrition occur only in the study cohort. Therefore non-death attrition may cause greater bias than death in longitudinal studies. However although more than a quarter of the oldest participants in the ALSWH died in the 12 years following recruitment, differences from the national population changed only slightly.

The accuracy of osteoporotic fracture risk prediction tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…The attrition rates vary considerably between the included studies, and most of them did not explain these rates. Death is a common cause of attrition in cohort studies of older people,78 which affects the accuracy of the models. Only some studies in this SR took this into account 39 41 45 47 48 57 58 61 62 64.…”

Lung function decline over 25 years of follow-up among black and white adults in the ARIC study cohort

“…Broadly speaking, previous studies of lung function decline have not implemented formal statistical methods to account for attrition. Previous studies of other outcomes have handled attrition using different methods [28,29]. For example, under attrition missing-at-random assumptions, longitudinal random effects [30] and traditional inverse-probability-weighted regression [31] approaches have addressed the potential bias resulting from the diminished representativeness of the study population at later visits through specification of the intra-subject correlation structure or the use of weights derived from a model that does not distinguish between sources of attrition.…”

Sitting-time and 9-year all-cause mortality in older women

“…Participants completed mailed surveys in 1996, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2011. At baseline, the women were largely representative of women aged 70–75 years in the Australian population, and analyses have shown that attrition has not resulted in bias for studies assessing mortality 15 16. More details can be found at http://www.alswh.org.au.…”