DOI: 10.18130/v3vm08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Awareness on Reducing Social Bias in Behavior

Abstract: Social bias in behavior is widespread. Interventions to reduce biased behavior have mostly been tested in isolation. As a result, it is unclear whether such interventions derive their effectiveness from theoretically-unique or common mechanisms. In this dissertation, a simultaneous test of four prominent bias reduction interventions revealed that each was able to reduce favoritism toward physically attractive people in an academic admissions task (Study 1). These interventions shared two features: 1) raising a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity, we refer to the manipulation as a "bias warning," but the intervention is multifaceted in that it (a) names a specific social dimension known to bias judgment, (b) identifies the direction of the bias, and (c) actively asks participants to avoid showing the bias. We included each of these components in an attempt to maximize the intervention's effectiveness, although we found evidence in other research that removing the text asking participants to avoid bias does not reduce the effect of the manipulation (Axt, 2017). Academic decision-making task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we refer to the manipulation as a "bias warning," but the intervention is multifaceted in that it (a) names a specific social dimension known to bias judgment, (b) identifies the direction of the bias, and (c) actively asks participants to avoid showing the bias. We included each of these components in an attempt to maximize the intervention's effectiveness, although we found evidence in other research that removing the text asking participants to avoid bias does not reduce the effect of the manipulation (Axt, 2017). Academic decision-making task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%