2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of banning mobile phones in Swedish secondary schools

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers underline that mobile phone use in classes should not be disregarded (Beland & Murphy, 2016). In a similar study by Kessel, Hardardottir, and Tyrefors (2020) in Sweden, it was determined that banning mobile phones have no effect on student performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers underline that mobile phone use in classes should not be disregarded (Beland & Murphy, 2016). In a similar study by Kessel, Hardardottir, and Tyrefors (2020) in Sweden, it was determined that banning mobile phones have no effect on student performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this, knowledge about the role of phones in the classroom and the ways in which they interact with teaching and other activities is still limited. Instead, research on smartphone presence and use in the classroom has, among other things, focused on the link between phone bans and student school performance (Beland & Murphy, 2016;Kessel et al, 2019), showing contradictory results. Research has also highlighted so called e-learning and the impact of phone use on student learning (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013;Wei et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates a co-constructed solution that may be accepted by schools, parents and children, by balancing out the risks using limits and boundaries. They communicate how schools could have a ban on mobile phones, which from a school's perspective can be deemed the most low-cost and effective policy (Kessel et al, 2020), but still create situations in which children could still contact home themselves, without using their own mobile phones. Participants showed equal involvement in the conversation, added to each other's sentences, forming a solution together.…”
Section: Tt (Child)mentioning
confidence: 99%