The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View

Abstract

Time plays an important role in corporate social responsibility (CSR) decisions. In the context of time and the boardroom, the consideration of CSR can be affected by board structure. For example, because of considerable short‐term pressures, this study posits that insiders on the board are less likely to prioritize the longer‐term time horizons needed to affect CSR. Following this perspective, a hypothesis is put forth that insiders generally have temporal orientations that are more short term in nature and that they therefore have a negative effect on CSR. A study of 300 of Australia's largest firms confirmed this hypothesis. However, when inside director compensation linked to environmental and social metrics and inside director CSR training are introduced as moderating variables, their interactive effects lead to positive results: both positively moderate the negative insider–CSR relationship in environmental and social dimensions. The study contributes to a temporal view of boards of directors, as well as to corporate governance and CSR. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

The direct and moderating effects of power distance on carbon transparency: An international investigation of cultural value and corporate social responsibility

“…Many studies on CSR examine the determinants that affect companies' commitment to environmental preservation (Carballo‐Penela & Castromán‐Diz, ; Caritte, Acha, & Shah, ; Glass, Cook, & Ingersoll, ; Habib & Bhuiyan, ; S. Wang, Li, & Zhao, ; Yu, Lo, & Li, ) and to social and environmental disclosure (D'Amico, Coluccia, Fontana, & Solimene, ; Galbreath, ; Gallego‐Alvarez, Ortas, Vicente‐Villardón, & Álvarez Etxeberria, ; Helfaya & Moussa, ; Jizi, ; Lokuwaduge & Heenetigala, ). Because carbon disclosure is voluntary, the reliability of CSR disclosure is a concern (Datt, Luo, & Tang, ; Datt, Luo, Tang, & Mallik, ; Luo & Tang, ).…”

Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter?

“…Second, little is known about how this nexus changes in the presence of specific features of the TMT. Preceding studies have examined board and governance characteristics, as the main determinants of firm's social/environmental management and financial performance (Ben‐Amar & McIlkenny, ; Chang, Li, & Lu, ; Eleftheriadis & Anagnostopoulou, ; Galbreath, , ; Haque & Ntim, ; Jizi, ; Lau, Lu, & Liang, ; McGuinness, Vieito, & Wang, ; Ntim, ; Sullivan & Gouldson, ). Nevertheless, these scholars have neither investigated the impact of TMT characteristics on environmental performance/financial distress nor how they can moderate environmental performance–financial distress nexus.…”

The role of directors representing institutional ownership in sustainable development through corporate social responsibility reporting

“…Company characteristics such as corporate governance may influence CSR. In this sense, previous studies have analyzed the relationship between board characteristics and CSR (Galbreath, ; Jizi, ). However, previous research on CSR has paid little attention to the role of directors appointed by institutional investors (hereafter institutional directors).…”