The impact of breathing on HRV measurements: Implications for the longitudinal follow‐up of athletes

Abstract

The purpose of the present work was to compare daily variations of heart rate variability (HRV) parameters between controlled breathing (CB) and spontaneous breathing (SB) sessions during a longitudinal follow-up of athletes. HRV measurements were performed daily on 10 healthy male runners for 21 consecutive days. The signals were recorded during two successive randomised 5-minutes sessions. One session was performed in CB and the other in SB. The results showed significant differences between the two respiration methods in the temporal, nonlinear and frequency domains. However, significant correlations were observed between CB and SB (higher than 0.70 for RMSSD and SD1), demonstrating that during a longitudinal follow-up, these markers provide the same HRV variations regardless of breathing pattern. By contrast, independent day-to-day variations were observed with HF and LF/HF frequency markers, indicating no significant relationship between SB and CB data over time. Therefore, we consider that SB and CB may be used for HRV longitudinal follow-ups only for temporal and nonlinear markers. Indeed, the same daily increases and decreases were observed whatever the breathing method employed. Conversely, frequency markers did not provide the same variations between SB and CB and we propose that these indicators are not reliable enough to be used for day-to-day HRV monitoring.

Is Baseline Cardiac Autonomic Modulation Related to Performance and Physiological Responses Following a Supramaximal Judo Test?

“…Finally, spontaneous breathing may be another limitation, although this is a persistent limitation in those field-test studies following supramaximal efforts. Moreover, recent studies [69] have shown that there are no differences between spontaneous breathing and controlled breathing in the longitudinal follow-up of athletes, at least for RMSSD, which is an important index in our study.…”

Validity of the ithleteTM Smart Phone Application for Determining Ultra-Short-Term Heart Rate Variability

“…The manufacturer has elected paced breathing to add a component of reliability to the conditions of the measurement process when taken daily (Wegerif, 2009). This may only be precautionary, however, as it has been recently shown that breathing rate does not appear to influence RMSSD, unlike spectral indexes (Pentilla et al, 2001; Saboul et al, 2013). Collectively, these findings suggest that RMSSD is less sensitive to the respiratory rate compared to frequency domain parameters (e.g., HF and LF) thus making it more suitable for assessment in field settings under ambulatory resting conditions.…”

Heart rate variability in the standing position reflects training adaptation in professional soccer players

“…However, resting breathing is not supposed to change during a several week training (Manzi et al 2009). Moreover, moderate alteration of resting breathing patterns does not influence spectral analysis results (Saboul et al 2013). A third explanation is that the view on the cardiovascular regulation through autonomic activity and balance is too simple and does not reflect the complexity of the system.…”