2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-4025-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of Bt maize expressing the Cry1Ac protein on non-target arthropods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed the Cry1Ab-Gc over-expression maize had no significantly negative impacts on arthropod diversity in the field. This result was consistent with previous studies, which proved that BT maize include Cry1Ab 49 , Cry1Ac 50 , 51 and Cry3Bb 52 did not affect the population dynamics and biodiversity of the non-target insect. Notably, in this study, we only conducted one-year research, so continuous and systematic research would be helpful to confirm the environmental safety of Cry1Ab-Gc protein release.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results showed the Cry1Ab-Gc over-expression maize had no significantly negative impacts on arthropod diversity in the field. This result was consistent with previous studies, which proved that BT maize include Cry1Ab 49 , Cry1Ac 50 , 51 and Cry3Bb 52 did not affect the population dynamics and biodiversity of the non-target insect. Notably, in this study, we only conducted one-year research, so continuous and systematic research would be helpful to confirm the environmental safety of Cry1Ab-Gc protein release.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results in this study showed no significant differences on the composition, species richness ( S ), Shannon–Wiener diversity index ( H′ ), evenness index ( J ), Simpson’s dominant concentration ( C ), community similarity and ecosystem functioning composition of the NTAs community between transgenic insect-resistant maize (SK12-5 transgenic Cry1Ab/2Aj ) and the non-GE maize. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that Bt maize producing Cry1Ab [ 18 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], Cry1Ab and Cry2Ab [ 45 ], Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab [ 46 , 47 ], Cry1Ac [ 48 , 49 , 50 ], Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab and Cry3Bb [ 51 ], Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac [ 52 ], Cry1Ab and VIP3A [ 53 ], Cry1F [ 54 , 55 , 56 ], Cry1Ah [ 57 ], Cry1Ie [ 58 , 59 , 60 ], Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 [ 55 , 61 ], Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 and Cry1F [ 55 , 61 ], Cry3Bb [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ] and VIP 3A [ 66 ] insecticidal proteins did not affect populations of NTAs in the field. Similarly, there were no significant effects detected in the majority of such filed experiments with Bt cotton and Bt rice [ 37 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…were unchanged, and organ biopsy results showed no disease and toxic effects (Hajimohammadi et al, 2021;Song et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2013b). In addition, neither germ cells nor somatic cells had mutagenic activity or presented a dose-independent effect (Carrière et al, 2009;Xing et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%