The impact of ‘Cash for Clunkers’ on greenhouse gas emissions: a life cycle perspective

Abstract

One of the goals of the US Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS) Act of 2009, more commonly known as 'Cash for Clunkers', was to improve the US vehicle fleet fuel efficiency. Previous studies of the program's environmental impact have focused mainly on the effect of improved fuel economy, and the resulting reductions in fuel use and emissions during the vehicle use phase. We propose and apply a method for analyzing the net effect of CARS on greenhouse gas emissions from a full vehicle life cycle perspective, including the impact of premature production and retirement of vehicles. We find that CARS had a one-time effect of preventing 4.4 million metric tons of CO 2 -equivalent emissions, about 0.4% of US annual light-duty vehicle emissions. Of these, 3.7 million metric tons are avoided during the period of the expected remaining life of the inefficient 'clunkers'. 1.5 million metric tons are avoided as consumers purchase vehicles that are more efficient than their next replacement vehicle would otherwise have been. An additional 0.8 million metric tons are emitted as a result of premature manufacturing and disposal of vehicles. These results are sensitive to the remaining lifetime of the 'clunkers' and to the fuel economy of new vehicles in the absence of CARS, suggesting important considerations for policymakers deliberating on the use of accelerated vehicle retirement programs as a part of the greenhouse gas emissions policy.

The carbon‐conscious‐consumer? A causal model for the product carbon footprint of asparagus at the consumer stage

“…Similar programs have been conducted in the automobile sector in different countries. Lenski et al (2010), e.g., state that the American 'Cash for clunkers' program of 2009 saved 4.4 tons of CO 2e , especially by more efficient cars. But when screening literature judging the ecological benefits of such programs, it becomes evident that not only the future savings on emissions must be taken into account but also upstream and downstream processes (Kim et al, 2003;Spitzley et al, 2005).…”

Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review

“…With vehicle utilization rates of 5%, the effect of lifetime extension is ambiguous as reduced material and energy requirements for manufacturing new vehicles is offset by performance differentials between new and used vehicles if fuel efficiency increases, although estimates of this increase range between 1.8-3% per year [14,143]. Use scenarios can be constructed which lead to modest emission reductions both for lifetime extension [144] and early retirement [145][146][147]. As fuel efficiencies plateau and vehicle manufacturing comprises a larger share of life cycle emissions, the benefit of lifetime extension will rise.…”

Accelerating Car Scrappage: A Review of Research into the Environmental Impacts

“…• Lenski et al, (2010) and Li et al, (2010) are about the US 2009 'Cash for Clunkers' scheme that provided a subsidy for trading in an older car (that was then dismantled) for a new car.…”