2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2013, massive proteinuria (ࣙ5 g) was eliminated from the diagnostic criteria of severe PE (ACOG; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013). A recent study by Carter et al (2015) showed no differences in PE occurrence in MCP and DCP, which is opposite to our results. Their sample size was bigger (2,301 women); however, there were some differences between our study protocols, which may explain the inconsistency of the results: longer study period (Carter et al collected data from 1990(Carter et al collected data from to 2010, methods of data collection (Carter et al lost 10% of patients in the follow-up between the USG scan and perinatal period) and differences in ethnicity of both groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, massive proteinuria (ࣙ5 g) was eliminated from the diagnostic criteria of severe PE (ACOG; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013). A recent study by Carter et al (2015) showed no differences in PE occurrence in MCP and DCP, which is opposite to our results. Their sample size was bigger (2,301 women); however, there were some differences between our study protocols, which may explain the inconsistency of the results: longer study period (Carter et al collected data from 1990(Carter et al collected data from to 2010, methods of data collection (Carter et al lost 10% of patients in the follow-up between the USG scan and perinatal period) and differences in ethnicity of both groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in agreement with a previous study from Leduc et al 12. However, Carter and Lewi et al reported a comparable perinatal outcome between MCDA and DCDA twins with excluding specific complications for MCDA twins1820. This may be due to the difference in prenatal monitoring and interventions at these centers21.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The similarity among both reported study populations may explain the lack of difference when predicting the risk of stillbirth among SGA twins. The chorionicity of the twin was not known and therefore could not be accounted; although outcomes can vary based on this information, 37 this has also been problematic among other publications on topic. [8][9][10][11] We categorized newborns as SGA,…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%