2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-003-2391-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of chromatography and mass spectrometry on the analysis of protein phosphorylation sites

Abstract: Protein phosphorylation analysis is an enormous challenge. This review summarises the currently used techniques, which are based on radiolabelling and mass spectrometry as well as electrophoretic and chromatographic separation. Many methods exist, but there is still no single procedure applicable to all phosphoproteins. MS is able to deliver information about the location of phosphorylation sites, but phosphospecific properties with respect to ionisation present obstacles. Therefore, multidimensional approache… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
(272 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, two of these phosphorylation sites (Tyr 163 and Ser 171 ) were not identified by mass spectrometry, possibly because MELK was phosphorylated substoichiometrically on these sites. Other groups have also noted that the detection of all phosphorylation sites in a protein remains a most challenging analytical task, even when sophisticated techniques of mass spectrometry are adopted (29,30). In any case, our findings nicely illustrate the importance of using multiple, independent approaches for the mapping of phosphorylation sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Surprisingly, two of these phosphorylation sites (Tyr 163 and Ser 171 ) were not identified by mass spectrometry, possibly because MELK was phosphorylated substoichiometrically on these sites. Other groups have also noted that the detection of all phosphorylation sites in a protein remains a most challenging analytical task, even when sophisticated techniques of mass spectrometry are adopted (29,30). In any case, our findings nicely illustrate the importance of using multiple, independent approaches for the mapping of phosphorylation sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These considerations demostrate how mass spectrometry in the field of phosphorylation mapping is still not a routine activity in most laboratories. [17][18][19] One of the obvious drawbacks of our heteronuclear NMR methodology is the need to obtain the assignment of the phosphorylated residues. After identification of these residues as serines, based on the CR/Cβ chemical shifts extracted from a CBCANH spectrum, our initial assignment was only based on the two residues surrounding the phospho-Ser.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when the enzymatic reaction is executed in a test tube with a well-known protein substrate and recombinant kinase, current analytical methods still face serious shortcomings. Despite impressive methodological developments, the necessity to preprocess the sample, the tendency of phosphorylation sites on Tau to cluster, and the technical difficulties inherently associated with the detection and quantification of the highly charged phospho-peptide prevent mass spectrometry from being a routine analytical tool to establish a precise phosphorylation pattern. Immunodetection by antibodies is equally limited by the requirement of a comprehensive antibody library against all possible epitopes and by the absence of a fully phosphorylated standard for every combination of sites in order to quantify the level of phosphorylation. New analytical methods able to rapidly identify the phosphorylation sites for a given kinase or combination of kinases and quantify their extent of phosphate incorporation are still needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, ions of the selected target molecules among the ions generated by ESI are extracted by the first quadrupole (Q1) [101]. The ions extracted by the Q1 are collided with Ar gas and fragmented by the second quadrupole (Q2) [102,103]. The fragmentation method is called collision-induced dissociation (CID).…”
Section: Lc/ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%