The impact of closeness on turnout: An empirical relation based on a study of a two-round ballot

Abstract

Several methodological difficulties emerge from the empirical evaluation of the impact of closeness on turnout. The most critical resides in the use of the actual electoral results to assess the impact of closeness. Important doubt therefore remains with respect to the empirical validity of the relationship between turnout and closeness. This article intends to explore this ambiguity by an econometric analysis of the two-round French legislative elections. The first ballot gives excellent information to the voters on the expected closeness of the upcoming second ballot. The results show that closeness, whatever its measure, has an important and meaningful impact on electoral participation. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

The Contraction Effect: How Proportional Representation Affects Mobilization and Turnout

“…However, consistent with Assumption 1, several studies find that closer competition in the first round tends to result in increased turnout in the second round (Fauvelle-Aymar and François, 2006;Indridason, 2008;De Paola and Scoppa, 2014;Garmann, 2014), including in the case of Norway (Fiva and Smith, 2015). reasonable since, if someone wins the first round, that same person would likely win the plurality contest; and the other candidates' incentives to coordinate are thus relatively weak regardless of the electoral rules.…”

Immigrants' Participation in Voting: Exposure, Resilience, and Transferability

“…When measured as voting intentions, turnout is positively correlated with the closeness of elections (Abramson, Diskin, and Felsenthal 2007;Fauvelle-Aymar and François 2006).…”

Participation in the 2010 French regional elections: The major impact of a change in the electoral calendar

“…27 Which implicitly suggests that voters formulate perfect expectations regarding the results of the elections. It must be pointed out, however, that a more correct measure of expectations does not significantly alter the empirical results (Fauvelle-Aymar and Franc¸ois, 2006). 28 This political group includes the socialist, communist and green lists, as well as those affiliated with them.…”