2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4954302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of collisionality, FLR, and parallel closure effects on instabilities in the tokamak pedestal: Numerical studies with the NIMROD code

Abstract: (2002)] on a diverted tokamak discharge. When the NIMROD model complexity is increased incrementally, resistive and first-order finite-Larmour radius effects are destabilizing and stabilizing, respectively. The full result is compared to local analytic calculations which are found to overpredict both the resistive destabilization and drift stabilization in comparison to the NIMROD computations. Published version: Phys. Plasmas 23, 062123 (2016) [http://dx

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
3
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
17
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For purely resistive MHD model without inclusion of 2-fluid effects, the increase in resistivity always destabilizes all range of the edge localized modes. This contrasts to the recent study using NIMROD where the resistive stabilizing effects on low-n edge localized modes appear in both the single-fluid and the two-fluid MHD models[24] which might be arising from different resistivity model used in ideal and resistive limit. Our results also differs from resisitive effect studies on peeling-ballooning modes in other codes as M3D-C 1 (in single fluid limit[26]) and BOUT++ (in 2-fluid limit with constant resistivity profile[27]).…”
contrasting
confidence: 89%
“…For purely resistive MHD model without inclusion of 2-fluid effects, the increase in resistivity always destabilizes all range of the edge localized modes. This contrasts to the recent study using NIMROD where the resistive stabilizing effects on low-n edge localized modes appear in both the single-fluid and the two-fluid MHD models[24] which might be arising from different resistivity model used in ideal and resistive limit. Our results also differs from resisitive effect studies on peeling-ballooning modes in other codes as M3D-C 1 (in single fluid limit[26]) and BOUT++ (in 2-fluid limit with constant resistivity profile[27]).…”
contrasting
confidence: 89%
“…It is also the peak location of the edge To check the generality of our findings, we turn to the full extended MHD model including two-fluid and finite-Larmor-radius (FLR) effects. For the static equilibriums, the increased density appears to be destabilize to high-n modes, which was also previously reported in [46].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Ref. [27][28][29]), which are known to modify the frequency through the mediation of the perturbations by both the ion and electron fluids are required to produce dynamics with a more representative frequency. The ion and electron fluids rotate in opposing directions for this discharge.…”
Section: Transport Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%