The impact of colonial and contemporary land policies on climate change adaptation in Zimbabwe’s communal areas

Abstract

The main aim of this article was to examine the impact of colonial and contemporary development policies on climate change adaptation among communal farmers in Zimbabwe. As such, the objective was to document and better understand how the legacy of colonialism, coupled with the current climate change impacts is making adaptation a serious challenge for farmers in particular regions of the country. This study was conducted in Zimbabwe’s Buhera Rural District (Ward 30) and Chipinge Rural District (Ward 11). Data collection involved the use of individual household interviews, with the use of a snowball sampling method, focus group discussions, key informant interviews and direct observation in the field. It was found that the lack of income diversity opportunities has further exposed several livelihoods to climate change and compromised their abilities to respond and recover under periods of climatic stress. It was ascertained that the adaptation challenges experienced by African farmers were brought about by the colonial land system that evicted them from their customary lands and allocated them land in poor agroecological regions that fail to support production. The authors argue that climate change adaptation challenges in communal areas should be understood from a colonial and historical development perspective that led to the establishment of communal farming zones. There is also a need to understand climate vulnerability in the context of post-independence development strategies that have led to the underdevelopment of peasant agriculture and reduced farmers’ ability to adapt to climate change.Contribution: Climate change adaptation policies should recognise the country’s colonial and historical legacy that has led to poverty and other livelihood challenges in communal areas. By acknowledging this, policymakers are better positioned to understand the structural issues making adaptation difficult, and they could intervene by proposing context-specific adaptation strategies that meet the needs of communal farmers.

An overview of Volume 14, No 1 (2022)

“…Various professionals also contribute to managing risk in society, and this is explored in relation to educators (Dzvimbo et al 2022 ), social workers (Matlakala, Makhubele & Nyahunda 2022 ), librarians (Chisita & Ngulube 2022 ), first responders (O’Neil & Kruger 2022 ), and health care professionals (Capili et al 2022 ). The differential experience of risk is invariably shaped by historical legacies of injustice and inequality, as Magana and Suso ( 2022 ) point out with regards to the impact of colonial land policies in Zimbabwe.…”