2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12026-019-09103-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of combining educational program with the improving of infrastructure to diagnose on early detection of primary immunodeficiencies in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] Since there is currently no neonatal screening for PIDs in Ukraine, defining of these symptoms is very important for a timely diagnosis of these diseases. [18] This study was limited to pool of patients followed up in one regional center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Since there is currently no neonatal screening for PIDs in Ukraine, defining of these symptoms is very important for a timely diagnosis of these diseases. [18] This study was limited to pool of patients followed up in one regional center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we aimed to improve the knowledge of warning and specific signs of PIDs. Particular attention was paid to the diagnosis of Nijmegen breakage syndrome and Di George syndrome, which are the most common in Ternopil region [12][13][14]. In this study, we see a significant increase in the percentage of correct answers (by 27.5%) in this block of questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Our previous study has shown that implementation of an educational program resulted in the increase of the number of detected PIDs immediately afterwards almost threefold, and compared to the two years prior to the awareness campaign (2015-2016) almost fivefold (2 cases per year before versus 9.5 cases per year during the awareness campaign) [14]. The number of children with suspected PIDs referred by pediatric sub specialists has almost doubled in the second year of the program (41 vs. 22) [14]. This result is consistent with those of previous studies measuring the impact of physician education and public awareness campaigns in Jeffrey Modell Centers Network of 39 countries and 120 cities worldwide [7].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Physician education can be an effective tool for increasing awareness about Lyme disease and the potential outcomes of treatment [19,20]. The improvement of doctors' knowledge about JHR will help to enhance alertness and to avoid unnecessary prescriptions and concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%