2020
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Compaction Force on Graft Consolidation in a Guided Bone Regeneration Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with those obtained previously by Viteri-Agustín et al [3], who studied the effect on bone regeneration in the vertical direction by applying different biomaterial compression forces in a model of a critical defect in a rabbit calvaria. Despite not observing statistically significant differences between the different compression forces, they did obtain significantly higher percentages of bone neoformation in the regions closest to the calvaria in both groups, albeit with lower values (29.0 ± 8.8% in the cases of lower compression forces and 27.6 ± 8.2% in the cases of higher compression forces) than the cases in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are in line with those obtained previously by Viteri-Agustín et al [3], who studied the effect on bone regeneration in the vertical direction by applying different biomaterial compression forces in a model of a critical defect in a rabbit calvaria. Despite not observing statistically significant differences between the different compression forces, they did obtain significantly higher percentages of bone neoformation in the regions closest to the calvaria in both groups, albeit with lower values (29.0 ± 8.8% in the cases of lower compression forces and 27.6 ± 8.2% in the cases of higher compression forces) than the cases in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The external cortex of the working area was removed with a tungsten carbide round handpiece bur (HM141F 031, Meisinger, Neuss, Germany), resulting in two defects of 8 mm diameter and 0.5 mm depth with a medullary bone base. Using two pins (Bone Management Master-Pin-Control ® , Meisinger, Neuss, Germany), titanium cylinders (Soadco S.L., Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra) designed specifically for this methodology and referenced in previous studies [3] were fixed. This process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Anesthesia and Surgical Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation