The Impact of Company Resources and Capabilities on Global New Product Program Performance

Abstract

Product innovation and the trend to globalization are two important and interrelated dimensions driving business today. In this article, the results of five published research articles on the topic of global new product development (NPD) are summarized to provide an integrated overview of the factors that impact global NPD program performance. The overall conceptual framework is based on three types of literature—NPD, globalization, and organization. The main theoretical approach for establishing relationships between factors is the dynamic capability/resource‐based view. Accordingly, factors linked to outcome are seen as operating on different organizational levels, with more actionable initiatives or ‘capabilities’ largely mediating the softer and longer term background ‘resources’ of the firm. The analyses are based on a broad cross‐industry sample of 467 firms (North America, Europe, B2B, goods/services). Three global NPD‐related background resources (global innovation culture, resource commitment, and senior management involvement), labeled the ‘behavioral environment’ of the firm, are identified and shown to be linked to global NPD program performance via the mediated effect of four specific NPD capabilities (NPD process, strategy, team, and IT/communication). A qualitative synthesis of the findings is provided, along with recommended management initiatives with which firms can enhance their performance in the global NPD effort. Both sets of factors are found to be essential and highly interrelated, but it is the strength of the behavioral environment resources that distinguish the best performing firms, setting the stage for success in global NPD.

Antecedents to Decision‐Making Quality and Agility in Innovation Portfolio Management

“…Previous studies by Cooper and colleagues show that top performers in IPM use formal portfolio processes (Cooper et al, ). Kleinschmidt, de Brentani, and Salomo () find that formal NPD processes increase the quality of information integration as well as homework and launch activities (see also de Brentani and Kleinschmidt, ). Teller et al () empirically show that formal project portfolio processes increase portfolio transparency and the quality of collaboration, which in turn increase portfolio success.…”

The Front End of Radical Innovation: A Case Study of Idea and Concept Development at Prime Group

“…Similarly, Cooper () found that climate and culture, along with an appetite to invest in innovative projects, and leadership skills, is what drives radical innovation. Yet another study demonstrates that internal resources such as culture and senior management support are what really matters (de Brentani & Kleinschmidt, ). These prior studies complement – rather than contradict – our findings.…”

Différencier les contributions des filiales d’une multinationale en matière d’innovation

“…Govindarajan & Ramamurti (2011) Mudambi (2011) propose un modèle de la FMN comprenant plusieurs hubs afin de faire face à la diversité des marchés locaux et à la montée en puissance rapide de certains pays émergents. Ces fortes hétérogénéités ont été soulignées notamment du fait de leurs conséquences en termes de politiques de contrôle et de ressources humaines (Jaussaud & Mayrhofer 2013;de Brentani & Kleinschmidt, 2015). Il ressort de ces analyses que les filiales peuvent avoir des contributions variées au processus d'innovation global de la FMN sans qu'elles n'aient été repérées de manière systématique ni mis en correspondance avec les typologies de filiales existantes.…”