2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.12.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of competing time delays in coupled stochastic systems

Abstract: We study the impact of competing time delays in coupled stochastic synchronization and coordination problems. We consider two types of delays: transmission delays between interacting elements and processing, cognitive, or execution delays at each element. We establish the scaling theory for the phase boundary of synchronization and for the steady-state fluctuations in the synchronizable regime. Further, we provide the asymptotic behavior near the boundary of the synchronizable regime. Our results also imply th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 in the (τ o , τ ) plane. In this simple case of two coupled nodes, the synchronization boundary is monotonic, and the local delay is dominant: There is no singularity (for any finite τ tr ) as long as στ o < 1/2 [66], while for any τ tr , there is a sufficiently large τ o resulting in the breakdown of synchronization. For N ≥ 3, the phase diagram (region of synchronizability) can be obtained numerically by tracking the zeros of the characteristic equation Eq.…”
Section: A Fully-connected Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 in the (τ o , τ ) plane. In this simple case of two coupled nodes, the synchronization boundary is monotonic, and the local delay is dominant: There is no singularity (for any finite τ tr ) as long as στ o < 1/2 [66], while for any τ tr , there is a sufficiently large τ o resulting in the breakdown of synchronization. For N ≥ 3, the phase diagram (region of synchronizability) can be obtained numerically by tracking the zeros of the characteristic equation Eq.…”
Section: A Fully-connected Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5.2: Performance of first-order consensus network with C = Mn was previously approximated in [25], [40] by using heuristic methods. We have utilized a systematic method to provide an approximate function (36) and we refer to [41] for more details.…”
Section: A Cost Function Approximation and Sdp Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T ∈ R n , and A is also known as the configuration matrix [18,30]. Equations (1) and (2) have been broadly studied in the literature in the context of neural networks [4], synchronization [15,16,35], traffic flow [5,6,37], and autonomous agents [18,[29][30][31]34,38,39]. Different than the earlier work, here we consider the graph as a parameter in the analysis of synchronization dynamics, and thus the objective here is to reveal how graphs corresponding to large dimensional A could be synthesized based on the eigenvalues of A, while assuring that the dynamics in Eq.…”
Section: A Synchronization Model With Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, synchronizability, delays, and graph structures are all interrelated, and thus need to be studied in an ensemble [29,32,33]. This observation motivates the paper, in which we take the equilibrium behavior of a synchronization dynamics studied * rifat@coe.neu.edu broadly in the literature [15,16,18,30,31,34,35] and explain the synchronizability (stability) features of the equilibrium in connection with (i) for how much delays synchronizability can still hold and (ii) how the corresponding graph structures can be tailored while still maintaining synchronizability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%