2009
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
290
2
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
290
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Mexico, Nicaragua and Brazil, which have also found stronger effects in rural areas (8,16,(35)(36)(37)(38) . On the other hand, we found no evidence that the programme had significant effects on maternal employment, women's empowerment, and women's knowledge, attitudes and practices about caregiving practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Mexico, Nicaragua and Brazil, which have also found stronger effects in rural areas (8,16,(35)(36)(37)(38) . On the other hand, we found no evidence that the programme had significant effects on maternal employment, women's empowerment, and women's knowledge, attitudes and practices about caregiving practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Transfers conditional on work, as in public works programmes, Tying cash transfers to human capital investments in children is argued to help break intergenerational poverty transmission. Systematic reviews of evidence on the impacts of cash transfer programmes indicate that they are effective in improving education attendance (Baird et al 2012), immunisation coverage (Gaarder et al 2010), health facility use (Lagarde et al 2009) and child nutrition (Manley et al 2012). Some reviews adopt a theory-based approach to analyse the mechanisms underlying these impacts (Leroy et al 2009;Gaarder et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include voucher schemes, where all or part of the cost of services are paid for specific groups, and cash transfer schemes, where women are reimbursed for the costs of maternity services. 2,7 In spite of the popularity of these schemes with policymakers, there is as yet insufficient evidence of their impact. 8 Rigorous evaluations are lacking, particularly evidence of effects of the schemes on utilisation, targeting, quality of care and maternal mortality and morbidity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%