2023
DOI: 10.1109/tte.2023.3245332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Considering State-of-Charge-Dependent Maximum Charging Powers on the Optimal Electric Vehicle Charging Scheduling

Abstract: Intelligent charging solutions facilitate mobility electrification. Mathematically, electric vehicle (EV) charging scheduling formulations are constrained optimization problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the optimal individual model is applied in to optimally distribute the EV charging load over the scheduling horizon to improve PV-EV synergy, and the applied QP will result in a polynomial increased complexity when increasing the number of variables (Goldfarb & Liu, 1990), making it difficult to apply to large-scale EV charging scheduling. Moreover, considering other practical constraints, such as the minimum charging power (considered in Qian, Fachrizal, Munkhammar, Ebel, and Adam (2023a)) or distinguishing charging and discharging (considered in Sabillón Antúnez, Franco, Rider, and Romero (2016)) will result in integer or binary decision variables, which leads to an exponential increase in computational complexity (Basu, Conforti, Di Summa, & Jiang, 2023;Morrison, Jacobson, Sauppe, & Sewell, 2016).…”
Section: Dynamic Load Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the optimal individual model is applied in to optimally distribute the EV charging load over the scheduling horizon to improve PV-EV synergy, and the applied QP will result in a polynomial increased complexity when increasing the number of variables (Goldfarb & Liu, 1990), making it difficult to apply to large-scale EV charging scheduling. Moreover, considering other practical constraints, such as the minimum charging power (considered in Qian, Fachrizal, Munkhammar, Ebel, and Adam (2023a)) or distinguishing charging and discharging (considered in Sabillón Antúnez, Franco, Rider, and Romero (2016)) will result in integer or binary decision variables, which leads to an exponential increase in computational complexity (Basu, Conforti, Di Summa, & Jiang, 2023;Morrison, Jacobson, Sauppe, & Sewell, 2016).…”
Section: Dynamic Load Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sortingbased methods usually lead to near-optimal performance. The optimal individual model can still be applied in a constrained infrastructure problem to find the optimal scheduling, such as in Qian et al (2023a). Apart from prioritizing the charging with a fixed infrastructure bottleneck, the maximum aggregated charging power can be a varying curve, such as following the PV generation in Kádár and Varga (2013), where the charging priority follows a first-come-first-server strategy.…”
Section: Isolated Load Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation