2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9413-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Corn Residue Removal on Soil Aggregates and Particulate Organic Matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residue baling reduced the amount of large dry aggregates in springtime. The decreased dry soil aggregate size after residue baling agrees with results from the few studies in the western Corn Belt (Blanco-Canqui et al, 2014;Osborne et al, 2014;Jin et al, 2015), which have found reduced soil dry aggregate size when corn residue was mechanically removed at high rates from no-till continuous corn systems under rainfed (Osborne et al, 2014;Jin et al, 2015) and irrigated (BlancoCanqui et al, 2014) conditions.…”
Section: Geometric Mean Diameter and Wind-erodible Fractionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Residue baling reduced the amount of large dry aggregates in springtime. The decreased dry soil aggregate size after residue baling agrees with results from the few studies in the western Corn Belt (Blanco-Canqui et al, 2014;Osborne et al, 2014;Jin et al, 2015), which have found reduced soil dry aggregate size when corn residue was mechanically removed at high rates from no-till continuous corn systems under rainfed (Osborne et al, 2014;Jin et al, 2015) and irrigated (BlancoCanqui et al, 2014) conditions.…”
Section: Geometric Mean Diameter and Wind-erodible Fractionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Recent studies have evaluated changes in WEF under mechanical removal of corn residues (Osborne et al, 2014;Jin et al, 2015). However, information on the effects of residue grazing on the wind erosion potential is extremely limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on REAP stover removal sites, estimated minimum stover retention rates of 6.4 ± 2.2 Mg stover ha −1 year −1 are required to maintain SOC, but residue retention rates should be considered site and management specific [79]. Reduced particulate organic matter stocks, an early indicator of management effects impacts, have been reported on stover removal sites [80] even when SOC stocks have increased over time [64]. A universal, stover harvest amount recommendation is not possible since management, landscape, and soil type influences stover retention requirements at the field level.…”
Section: Corn Stover Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stover removal decreased, increased, or did not affect the ratio of soil fungi to bacteria, with variability in responses attributed to differences in specific site characteristics (i.e., soils, management history) and climate [102]. Stover removal, however, consistently degraded soil physical quality at all sites, resulting in decreased soil stocks of particulate organic matter, break down of larger soil aggregates, and increased erosion potential [64,80]. Companion management practices that enhanced system biomass inputs (e.g., increased fertilizer N rates, cover crop use) tended to ameliorate negative soil impacts of stover removal.…”
Section: System Sustainability and Climate Change Mitigation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major concern associated with harvesting crop residues as bioenergy feedstock is potential negative impact of biomass removal on overall soil quality and long-term productivity due to a decrease in C inputs to soil [17][18][19]. Incorporating cover crops in a crop rotation is a prospective management strategy to offset potential negative consequences from residue harvest [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%