2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2013.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Financial Outcomes of Global Diversification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mangunyi (2011) study on the bank in Kenya mentioned that better corporate governance leads to better firm performance. In addition, Salama and Putnam (2013) findings reveal that that globally diversified companies with higher quality corporate governance perform better and are traded at higher values. The study utilizes some variables to measure the quality of corporate governance: 1) board of directors' quality (leadership structure, board size, board meetings, board independence, busyness of board, and board-shares ownership); 2) audit committee quality (audit committee size and audit committee meetings); and 3) compensation committee quality (compensation committee size and compensation committee meetings).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mangunyi (2011) study on the bank in Kenya mentioned that better corporate governance leads to better firm performance. In addition, Salama and Putnam (2013) findings reveal that that globally diversified companies with higher quality corporate governance perform better and are traded at higher values. The study utilizes some variables to measure the quality of corporate governance: 1) board of directors' quality (leadership structure, board size, board meetings, board independence, busyness of board, and board-shares ownership); 2) audit committee quality (audit committee size and audit committee meetings); and 3) compensation committee quality (compensation committee size and compensation committee meetings).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, the corporate governance quality measure is based on board size, SSB size, CEO power, board independence and audit committee size. In accordance with the procedures adopted by earlier research (e.g., Hudaib and Cooke, 2005;Salama and Putnam, 2013) Similarly, it is important to consider the effect of size on bank's investment strategies.…”
Section: [Insert Table 6 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a negative relation is expected between capital expenditures and cash holdings. It is measured as capital expenditures divided by sales (Ramírez & Tadesse, 2009;Salamaa & Putnamb, 2013).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%