The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Speed of OFDI under the Belt and Road Initiative

Abstract

Since the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Chinese firms have actively responded to the government’s call to accelerate outward foreign direct investment (OFDI). Based on resource dependence theory and institutional theory, this study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the speed of OFDI under BRI and its boundary conditions. The results show that CSR can promote the speed of OFDI under BRI because CSR can help a firm accumulate strategic resources, including external benefits such as a good corporate image, and internal resources such as human capital and dynamic capabilities, and thus enhance legitimacy in host countries and its ability to resist potential risks. We also find that both state ownership and CEO political connections weaken the positive effect of CSR, and if the firm is in the key provinces or key industries of BRI, the positive relationship between CSR and the speed of OFDI under BRI will decrease. Our study contributes to the literature on international business and provides suggestions for firms participating in BRI.

Does Environmental Protection Law Bring about Greenwashing? Evidence from Heavy-Polluting Firms in China

“…When making decisions, firms will consider the requirements of the institutional environment and comply with the expectations and regulations of external institutions to ensure their legitimacy [35]. Although it may not necessarily promote economic performance within the firm, it can help to obtain and enhance its legitimacy, thereby obtaining the resources for firms [36][37][38]. Government regulation is an important element of the institutional environment [39], and the new EPL, as a law, is a government regulation that firms need to face.…”

The Moderating Role of Country Governance in the Link between ESG and Financial Performance: A Study of Listed Companies in 58 Countries

“…To better understand the contingencies that may contribute to elaborating the divergent outcomes of ESG performance, other key factors, such as macro-level factors, may need to be considered [22][23][24], as business firms' ESG practices are largely subject to the contexts in which they operate [25]. Some studies show that firms' performance may vary across countries even if similar resources are allocated to the ESG activities of these firms [26,27], but the country-level contingencies are often underestimated when examining ESG practices [12,28].…”