2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/738/1/012009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of corruption on the sustainable development of human capital

Abstract: Abstract. The article explains the use of the human capital sustainable development index (HCSDI) to assess the quality of the reproduction of human capital. The paper provides the algorithm for calculating HCSDI and its components. Authors estimated cross-country differences of HCSDI and developed econometric model of the impact of corruption on HCSDI. The use of this model has allowed to reveal the mechanism and assess the impact of corruption on HCSDI and its components. The results of econometric analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of Achim [21] conducted on a sample of 185 countries for the 2012-2015 period shows that corruption significantly reduces the ease of doing business, the level of entrepreneurship and market capitalization as selected indicators for business development, being a major obstacle for economic growth. Regarding the impact of corruption on sustainable development the findings of Absalyamova et al [22] reveal a negative effect as follows: a 1% increase in the corruption levels of the socio-economic systems of a state causes a decrease of more than 1% of the value of the human capital sustainable development index (HCSDI) of that state. In the same view, Forson et al [23] find that corruption poses a long-term threat to the sustainable development of 22 economies in Sub-Sahara Africa.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of Achim [21] conducted on a sample of 185 countries for the 2012-2015 period shows that corruption significantly reduces the ease of doing business, the level of entrepreneurship and market capitalization as selected indicators for business development, being a major obstacle for economic growth. Regarding the impact of corruption on sustainable development the findings of Absalyamova et al [22] reveal a negative effect as follows: a 1% increase in the corruption levels of the socio-economic systems of a state causes a decrease of more than 1% of the value of the human capital sustainable development index (HCSDI) of that state. In the same view, Forson et al [23] find that corruption poses a long-term threat to the sustainable development of 22 economies in Sub-Sahara Africa.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a summary measure of the average achievement in three key dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, being aware of the cause and having a decent standard of living, according to UNDP Human Development Reports [45]. The HDI indicator is used in many research papers as a proxy for sustainable development [22,46]. (b) Environmental performance index (EPI) which provides a national scale of how close countries are to meeting the established environmental policy goals.…”
Section: Defining Independent Variables: Economic and Sustainable Devmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by UNDP (2008) observed that human development can reduce corruption. However, other studies (Becherair and Tahtane, 2017;Absalyamova et al, 2016) also established a negative correlation between corruption and human development in MENA countries implying that when HDI increases corruption reduces. In terms of poverty, studies have established that corruption does not affect poverty directly, rather through intermediaries such as economic and governance factors that in turn produce poverty.…”
Section: Mulenga and Mulenga 133mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Generally, the study has established that corruption can have an influence on key socioeconomic indicators such as the HDI across selected countries. This was observed in various studies which have established association between corruption and socioeconomic indicators such as economic growth and development (Sebake, 2017;UNDP, 2008) and poverty (Becherair and Tahtane, 2017;Absalyamova et al, 2016). They all point to the fact that ending corruption is a one of the necessary preconditions to the achievement of the key socioeconomic outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Their study also found According to the degree of corruption, the lead areas are education and health care that directly impairs the quality of human capital'. (Svetlana Absalyamova et al, 2016) Indonesia is also experiencing similar conditions, where, from time to time level of poverty is never significantly reduced. Based on the report of the National Statistics Agency (BPS), the number of poor people in Indonesia in 2016 reached 27,76 million, while in 2017, it was 26,58 million.…”
Section: Impact Of Corrupt Politicians In the Livelihoods Of Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%