2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
109
5
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
10
109
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultural traits enhancing equality, independence from political influence or individual status have also been proved to be conducive to economic growth (Voigt, Gutmann, & Feld, 2015). Our finding suggests that a country's openness to diversity strengthens the effect of board diversity reforms on banks' overall performance and is, therefore, an important factor to be considered when assessing the impact of reforms (Frijns, Dodd, & Cimerova, 2016).…”
Section: Stockmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Cultural traits enhancing equality, independence from political influence or individual status have also been proved to be conducive to economic growth (Voigt, Gutmann, & Feld, 2015). Our finding suggests that a country's openness to diversity strengthens the effect of board diversity reforms on banks' overall performance and is, therefore, an important factor to be considered when assessing the impact of reforms (Frijns, Dodd, & Cimerova, 2016).…”
Section: Stockmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The other results are consistent with Tables 3 and 4, and our conclusions unchanged. 12 outcomes (Frijns, Dodd and Cimerova, 2016;Masulis, Wang and Xie, 2012). However, board ethnic diversity and national diversity are empirically distinct: the correlation between the fraction of ethnic minority directors (being an ethnic minority director) and the fraction of foreign directors (being a foreign director) is just 0.065 (0.089).…”
Section: Robustness Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carter et al (2010) control for the possibility that past performance influences board diversity, but not future performance. 3 Studies have also illustrated the importance of nationality (Frijns, Dodd and Cimerova, 2016;Masulis, Wang and Xie, 2012), financial expertise (Guner, Malmendier and Tate, 2008), political experience (Agrawal and Knoeber, 2001;Goldman, Rocholl and So, 2009) and occupation [CEOs (Fahlenbrach, Low and Stulz, 2010), bankers (Dittman, Maug and Scheider, 2010), academics (Francis, Hasan and Wu, 2015;White et al, 2014) and former CEOs (Fahlenbrach, Minton and Pan, 2011)]. and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first impact is on the internal management process. In multicultural organizations, communication costs are higher, making collaboration more difficult and worsening company performance [7]. IJVS usually adopt joint review and collective decision-making in management, which is quite different from the Chinese shareholders' philosophy of highlighting the main person in charge.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a type of cross-border cooperation by FDI, IJVS regularly faces cross-border management involvement [4]. This makes the performance even more susceptible to various factors, for example, culture [5][6][7][8][9]. Although many scholars found the impact of culture on performance, the results remain mixed, especially for emerging markets, and to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies investigating the role of cultural difference in explaining the poor performance of IJVS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%